30 Minutes Or Less

Topic started by Rorie on Aug. 12, 2011. Last post by ultimatepunchrod 1 year, 3 months ago.
Post by Rorie (3,216 posts) See mini bio

It’s tempting to say that the funniest moment of 30 Minutes Or Less comes during its credits. I’m not talking about bloopers or outtakes, though: I’m actually referring to the brazen inclusion of a “any similarity to persons living or dead is purely coincidental” notice, considering that the film, which is about a pizza delivery driver who has a bomb strapped to his chest and is forced to rob a bank, has a plot that's borrowed wholesale from the story of Brian Douglas Wells...a real-life pizza delivery driver who had a bomb collar attached to his neck and was forced to rob a bank. Again, it’s tempting to say that the inclusion of that disclaimer is the funniest part of the movie, but it’s not entirely true; the film does manage some laughs, but far, far fewer than you might think given the talent on display. Unless, perhaps, you think people yelling at each other is automatically funny.

If you do, then you’re in for a treat, because first-time screenwriter Michael Dilberti sure seems to assume that volume and swearing is an appropriate humor delivery system in the absence of, say, jokes. No one converses in this film if the alternative is to scream at each other at very close range, and since we’re given two pairs of high-strung friends to follow along, a whole mess of loud noises sustains the film’s volume level from near the beginning until the end. There are humorous lines here and there, and the situations that the characters find themselves in can be amusing in a madcap kind of way, but this is still a film that suffers from a sense of construction, of deliberate artifice behind its creation. A bit more looseness and a tad more sincere back-and-forth between the characters, instead of having them merely recite lines, would’ve done the film well.

One such pair of friends, Nick (Jesse Eisenberg) and Chet (Aziz Ansari) are the dupes here; Nick’s got a dead-end job and is about to see the love of his life move to Atlanta, but shortly thereafter sees his life flipped around when that pesky little bomb-vest gets attached to his abdomen and he’s told that he has ten hours to retrieve $100,000 from a local bank. Not knowing precisely what to do in such a situation, he calls upon his best friend, Chet, to help figure out how to either get the bomb off (Chet’s idea being to take him to the hospital, have his arms removed, and slide the vest off before reattaching his limbs) or, failing that, to pull off the bank robbery and not get caught.

Compare and contrast with Dwayne (Danny McBride) and Travis (Nick Swardson), who cook up the scheme to get a patsy to rob a bank for them to raise that hundred grand to pay for an assassin to kill Dwayne’s father (Fred Ward, who's great as ever) and earn his inheritance a few years before he might otherwise do so. Dwayne is about as perfect a role for McBride as you might imagine, with that characteristic mixture of braggadocio, stupidity, and filthy-mindedness that we’ve come to expect from the bulk of his characters. Swardson acts as the simple-minded sidekick who uses the “that’s what she said” line in situations where it doesn’t make sense. (And having a character literally unaware of how to be funny is ironic here, considering 30 Minutes' problems in that regard.)

There’s a lot of talent on display here, with Ansari and McBride bringing ferocious improv chops to their television roles on Parks & Recreation and Eastbound And Down, Swardson being an accomplished standup from a young age, and Eisenberg pulling off precisely this kind of nebbishy, frustrated humor in many of his previous roles. It’s difficult to comprehend, then, precisely why the film falls so flat so consistently, but it would appear that director Ruben Fleischer (who worked with Eisenberg previously on the superlative Zombieland) and his cast chose a slavish devotion to the script rather than risking any attempts at ad libbing. The lines feel too constructed to be conversational, and that prevents the audience from getting any real sense of a relationship between the two pairs. Ansari and Eisenberg’s characters are old friends because we’re told they are, not because the pair are allowed to explore any kind of chemistry that might well up from their dialogue

Dilberti attempts to gain a lot of mileage with Beavis And Butthead-grade scatological jokes from a perpetually sex-focused McBride, but none of it’s very shocking or amusing, unless you’re the sort who giggles at the notion of calling fellatio “polishing the scepter” or someone announcing in the middle of a meal that “I gotta take a shit!” Yeah, it’s like that. Ansari and Eisenberg get some slightly better material, with Ansari especially coming off well when he gets a chance to let loose, but again, they mostly talk about the fact that Nick fucked Chet’s sister on their high school graduation night. This is a film that constantly seems on the verge of mirth, but refrains from venturing towards the more difficult ground on the border of outright hilarity.

What’s perhaps more peculiar is the film’s R-rating; I hate to assume anything, but this is a movie that feels like the studio saw the success of The Hangover and decided to throw in a few bare breasts to make their offering seem a bit more edgy. There are a few curse words here and there, but nothing that really pushes any boundaries; it’s difficult to see, absent a short stripclub sequence, why any of the material on hand warrants an R. Dwayne’s character does talk about sex acts a lot, sure, but usually under the guise of the ridiculous euphemisms mentioned above; it’s crass, but not in a way that seems to be especially bold or notable. If you’re expecting some kind of hilariously outré comedy exclusively for adults, you’ll probably be better off checking out one of the other six R-rated comedies that have appeared in the last few months.

You’ll get a laugh here and there from 30 Minutes Or Less; it’s by no means a complete failure. It is, however, a film that thinks it’s funnier than it actually is, and while some of its deficiencies in the humor department might have been salvaged by a more robust conclusion or some rousing action sequences, neither of those options are really on the table, either. Fleischer and Dilberti aren’t the first to try and take a real-world tragedy (Wells eventually died during a police standoff when his neck-bomb exploded) and turn it into a filmed comedy, but they also don’t appear to be the most competent at such a strategy. With any other group of actors, this is a film that might have turned into a decent 90 minutes of bored Netflix Instant Streaming, but the actual product is all the more disappointing considering the high level of quality we’ve come to expect from the director and cast.

Post by Ketchupp (7 posts) See mini bio

Saw this last night and I feel the exact same.

Post by Jeffmoocow (156 posts) See mini bio

Wow this is a disappointment, I was really looking forward to it too.

Post by Artie (228 posts) See mini bio
The concept looked dumb. I feel like I've developed a six sense of when comedies will be funny or not. 
 
And about 80% of the time they're not funny.
Post by RockinKemosabe (884 posts) See mini bio

This movie needed Emma Stone to make it good.

Post by themw007 (14 posts) See mini bio
Yeah my expectations were high for this movie and other than Aziz, I didn't think it was extremely funny. Fleischer should start working on Zombieland 2 already as that is what most people would rather see.
Post by Mushir (1,149 posts) See mini bio

Ah, that's a damn shame. Was looking forward to this one.

Post by PatVB (3,546 posts) See mini bio
Moderator

I saw this last night and couldn't agree more. It wasn't actively bad like The Change-Up, but it certainly wasn't very good. I almost fell asleep a few times.

Post by FLYmeatwad (133 posts) See mini bio
Nice review. I like the cast, so I may check it out on DVD, but I didn't like Zombieland and was likely going to skip this anyhow until it hit Netflix/Redbox. 
 
Though I think the people yelling constantly rather than talking is at least an equal split of responsibility between the director and the screenwriter. Actually, maybe even more the director's fault since he could have instructed the guys to reign it in a bit more or play the script differently.
Post by President_Barackbar (525 posts) See mini bio

Hmm, that's interesting, I have a friend who went to a test screening of the film quite a while ago and had nothing but good things to say about it. Now that I think about it though, he's also a huge fan of Family Guy, so I take that with a grain of salt.

Post by coonce (97 posts) See mini bio
Staff

interesting... this actually looked really funny (great cast) -- good to know its a stay away.

Post by MisterMouse (477 posts) See mini bio
Yeah I was afraid that would happen unfortunately, was really hoping it would do well though.
Post by FoxMulder (246 posts) See mini bio

Yeah it had a few laughs, but much of the dialogue is just crude to be crude. The plot is pretty badly paced and you really don't care for any of the characters from the start.

Post by Napalm (350 posts) See mini bio
I disagree. I thought this movie was hilarious.
Post by Godlyawesomeguy (604 posts) See mini bio
@President_Barackbar said:

 Now that I think about it though, he's also a huge fan of Family Guy, so I take that with a grain of salt.

Hey, early-to-mid family guy was legitimately great. As for this movie, I had an idea that it wouldn't be good. The R-rated comedies coming out lately haven't been great.
Post by psychpunk (271 posts) See mini bio
Def a bummer as I'm a fan of all involved. Only solace I take is its more of a script problem than anything else. I still have high hopes for Zombieland 2.
Post by TurboMan (63 posts) See mini bio

I just got out of watching this, and while I don't think it's a homerun, I feel it's a lot better than what most of the reviews are saying about it.

There is a lot of humor that falls flat on it's face. Most of the Aziz/Eisenberg material is 50/50 on whether or not it's legitimately funny, but the situations they are in and how they handle them are genuinely entertaining at least. Michael Pena is the guy that steals the show (again), and Nick Swardson puts on a fun performance.

I haven't read too many reviews, but I'm curious if people are all over Danny McBride or not. Very few things that he does is funny, but his performance reminded me of Seth Rogan's in Observe and Report(A movie I love). Danny is a fucked up idiot... but he's a dangerous fucked up idiot, and does a great job in making me wonder what he's going to do to Jesse Eisenburg next.

Overall, the first half of the movie is the premise, which is covered by the trailer. You go see this movie to see how the premise pays out, and I enjoyed it more as a bank robbery movie with a twist than an actual comedy. Not to say it isn't funny, but the situation and characters kept me in it.

Post by Dylabaloo (821 posts) See mini bio

I'm going to see this tomorrow, I hope I like it better Rorie.

Post by TheCheese33 (109 posts) See mini bio

This is the first review you guys have written that I disagree with. While I agree with some of the issues you had, overall I found it to be rather hilarious.

Post by TheCheese33 (109 posts) See mini bio

After giving it some time, you're right. It was kind of terrible.

30 votes, 2.7 avg.
General Information Edit
Name 30 Minutes or Less
US Release Aug. 12, 2011
UK Release Sept. 16, 2011
AUS Release
Runtime 83
Language(s)
Add a new language
Genre(s)
Add a new genre
Theme(s)
Add a new theme
Rating R
Alias(es)
Top Rated Lists
Movies I've Seen a list of 1916 items by Zicdab
Movies I've Seen In 2011 a list of 114 items by Delta5A93
Movies Seen In 2011 For the First Time a list of 139 items by GreatestEver99
Similar Movies Edit
We don't have any info about 30 Minutes or Less's related movies. Help us fill it in!
  • In today's dollars
    Domestic $37,053,924
    Foreign +2,386,850
  • = total worldwide gross $39,440,774
  • - a reported budget of $28,000,000
  • = a 40.9% net profit of $11,440,774
Top Editors
Mandatory Network

Submissions can take several hours to be approved.

Save ChangesCancel