I Have A Theory on the Nolan Snub

Topic started by ThePickle on Jan. 31, 2011. Last post by VioletEyedDragon 1 year, 3 months ago.
Post by ThePickle (2,751 posts) See mini bio
I was thinking about the Best Director category and who Nolan would replace if he was nominated. Then it struck me: 
 
All of the director's have at least one actor/actress nominated for their films (Portman for Black Swan, Eisenberg for the Social Network, ect..). Nolan has none. More importantly, that's the one category where Inception honestly deserved to be excluded from. No one was bad, but no one was stand out amazing like James Franco or Colin Firth. The main attraction for Inception is the complexity of the story and the visuals.  
 
I'm not saying this snub was legitimate, I'm just saying this is probably why it happened.  
 
Do you agree/disagree? 
Post by gangly (1,213 posts) See mini bio
Very interesting thoughts about the Actor-Director connection, and I totally agree. 
 
I think most people overlook that traditionally a Director's primary responsibility is to get the perfect performance from their actors.  So even when it's clear that Inception was really a work that was Nolan (if that makes sense), if none of the performances stick out, it sort of makes sense that the Best Director nod goes to other folks.
Post by FrozenPeas (417 posts) See mini bio
@Pickle:  It's a fresh take on the snub and I think an interesting one. I still feel Nolan should probably be given at the least a nomination because I thought Inception would not have been a good film if handled by a lesser director. 
Post by Icon (544 posts) See mini bio
The performance of an actor or ensemble does say a lot about the direction, so I think you may be on to something. Good theory.
Post by Romination (693 posts) See mini bio
That's true, but the thing is, all of the acting in Inception WAS great. Not Oscar worthy, but still extremely good, and the directing in Inception is such a sum of its parts, what with story, cinematography, characters and everything coming into play and working off of each other.
Post by Ortep (1 posts) See mini bio
Good point. However Peter Jackson was not only nominated but won for Return of the King and that didn't have any actor nods.  
 
I'm sure it's probably happened more and i guess it all depends on the structure of the films themselves.
Post by Bones8677 (267 posts) See mini bio
I liked Natalie Portman, but nothing she did in that movie felt like Oscar material.
Post by Flap_jackson (883 posts) See mini bio
No, they just think that Tom Hooper is the shit, and Nolan isn't.
Post by VioletEyedDragon (1,203 posts) See mini bio
Online Now
@Pickle: i totally agree with you.  thats probably why.
i also want to share my personal belief that inception is overrated and maybe nolan didnt deserve it as much as the others.
General Information Edit
Credited Name Christopher Nolan
Gender Male
Birthday July 30, 1970
Death
Primary Role Director
Hometown London
Country England, United Kingdom
Website
Email Address
Alias(es)
Top Rated Lists
Favourite Film Makers a list of 25 items by Icon
Best Psychological Thrillers I've Seen a list of 9 items by AssInAss
Favorite Auteurs a list of 11 items by Paper
Works Often With
PROTIP! Click numbers to highlight links!
  • Box Office
    Career $2.5B
    Average $223.9MM
  • show in today's dollars »
  • activity & ranking
    34 Netflix actions for Christopher Nolan
  • By Decade
    2010
    2000
    1990
    1980
  • By Rating
    5/5
    4/4
    3/3
    2/2
    1/1
    0/0
  • By Box Office Gross
    200MM+
    150MM+
    100MM++
    50MM++
    25MM++
    0MM++
  • edit Links Around the Web
  • In today's dollars
    Career $2.5B
    Average $223.9MM
Top Editors
Top Posters
HandsomeDead
5 posts
Romination
5 posts
Bones8677
4 posts
Joe
3 posts
Icon
3 posts
DrPockets000
2 posts
Undeadpool
2 posts
uskomaton
2 posts
PatheticMan
2 posts
Olivaw
2 posts

Submissions can take several hours to be approved.

Save ChangesCancel