Dinner for Schmucks

Topic started by Alex on July 30, 2010. Last post by DanK 1 year, 4 months ago.
Post by Alex (325 posts) See mini bio
Staff
If Dinner for Schmucks speaks to anything, it's how much a strong cast can prop up even the most middling material. Director Jay Roach has assembled a phenomenal group of comedic talent for his “inspired by” remake of Francis Veber's French-language comedy The Dinner Game—unfortunately, he didn't assemble a screenplay to match. But when you have Steve Carell and Paul Rudd as your leads, sometimes that's all you need to pull some memorable comedic moments out of a script that doesn't have a great deal of them.
 
The titular dinner at the center of this film is a sort of corporate scumbag comedy show, where executives at a powerful investment firm once a month gather at the home of their charmingly slimy boss ( Bruce Greenwood) while bringing along a local idiot of their choosing to entertain the corporate elite with their unique brand of buffoonery. Rudd plays Tim, an underling at the company on the come-up who finds himself invited to this mean-spirited dinner party. Impressing the bosses could lead to a big promotion, but Tim's girlfriend (a near-saintly Stephanie Szostak) thinks it's a vile, disgusting idea (which it is, of course). Moral dilemma achieved.
 
It's only really a dilemma during the five or so minutes it takes before Tim literally runs into Steve Carell's Barry with a Porsche. Barry is like a demigod among awkward fools. Apart from being just a walking, talking, bespectacled ball of uncomfortable to be around, Barry also has a talent for taxidermy, making lovingly crafted dioramas using dead mice he happens to find lying around. As an aside, these dioramas are worth some kind of production design nod at the Oscars next year, if you ask me. I'd have almost rather watched an entire movie told through these dead mouse tableaus.
 
Tim, seeing providence in this encounter, decides to befriend this poor dolt and bring him to dinner. What follows is a torrential downpour of Jay Roach-brand over-the-top uncomfortable. Carell careens through Tim's life like a drunken elephant, laying waste to his apartment, his car, and even his relationship, through many a “hilarious misunderstanding.” Regrettably, shockingly few of these misunderstandings result in actual laughs. Roach seems content to rely on wild gesticulations, overwrought side characters and occasional off-kilter misunderstandings of pop culture to carry this thing through, with only a smattering of legitimately clever jokes to prop up all those histrionics. There's also something a little suffocating about the timing and the pacing of it all. Apart from the movie being at least 15 minutes too long, many of the gags seem to come at a labored pace, forced into nooks and crannies of dialogue that just don't sound funny when read as they are.
 
But again, the cast does more than its share in attempting to turn this material into something watchable, and periodically pretty funny. Carell is something otherworldly here as Barry. He somehow manages to rein in any temptation to fly off into hysterics the way others in the film often do, and maintains a sort of quiet, innocent sadness that makes his enfeebled attempts at interacting with humanity far more sympathetic than they probably have any right to be. Rudd is as effortlessly charming as he tends to be in most movies, even though Tim's character is underwritten to the point of being little more than the kindling Barry's blazing inferno of stupidity needs to get from scene to scene.
 
The supporting cast is equally overqualified for what they're working with. Zach Galifianakis turns in a memorably insidious performance as Barry's IRS rival, whose obsession with mind control leads to some truly bizarre scenes between the two. Chris O'Dowd of the UK sitcom The IT Crowd has a good, random appearance as an enraged blind swordsman. The standout, however, is Jemaine Clement as Kieran, a predictably out-of-his-mind photo artist that Tim's girlfriend manages. In the hands of pretty much anyone else, Kieran would have been pure, nonstop gimmick, but Clement's laid-back approach and uncanny ability to sexualize goat leggings allow him to wring something damned close to special out of the character. 
 
That's as good a summary for the whole movie as any, I suppose. Dinner for Schmucks always seems like it's hovering somewhere near a level of greatness, always a step away from hitting just the right comic note, or putting forth something truly, uniquely bizarre to stick with you once you've left the theater, but then it just never quite gets there. The only reason I remember as much as I do, and laughed as often as I did, is because of the quality work put forth by a cast that really, truly deserved a better script than the one they were handed. Fans of Carell, Rudd and the rest of this motley crew will find things to like about Dinner for Schmucks, but they'll also be disappointed that these comedians aren't given a greater opportunity to shine.  
Post by nofx4208 (1,423 posts) See mini bio
I still haven't seen Jemaine Clement in any of the trailers. As a huge fan of his, I'm going insane  
 
edit: just saw the picture... amazing.
Post by Aarny (743 posts) See mini bio
Jemaine will always be the best thing about everything he's in.
Post by Yummylee (205 posts) See mini bio
Steve Carell you say?? Must watch!
Post by JJWeatherman (356 posts) See mini bio
Too bad the script held it back. I could tell by the trailers that it wouldn't be an absolute must-see though.
Post by JackiJinx (93 posts) See mini bio
I wish I saw this before I went to see it. It's alright, but the reason to see it is for Steve and Steve alone.  
 
That, and the mice. I could really go for a poster of some of those mice dioramas. 
Post by simian (163 posts) See mini bio
jemaine is in it? Consider me now tempted for a matinée showing of this now.
Post by TheFaithfullyDeparted (1,852 posts) See mini bio
ill see this as soon as i can than
Post by DanGarofalo (194 posts) See mini bio
I love Paul Rudd, and the entire cast, but this movie just looks really insulting on many levels. Coming off the trailers, I felt as if the movie was insulting mentally disabled people, turning me off this movie entirely.
Post by Pinescentzilla (186 posts) See mini bio
Great cast, I honestly didn't think the movie looked great from the trailers but I'll still end up seeing it
Post by Godlyawesomeguy (603 posts) See mini bio
Going to a PG-13 comedy sounds very unappealing. I will Rent it.
Post by skrutop (679 posts) See mini bio
I'll probably go see this, though I have the feeling that I can predict about 90% of the plot.
Post by JauntyHat (36 posts) See mini bio
Alex! Have you had the chance to see the original French film? You kinda mentioned it at the beginning of the review but never really made much comparison beyond that. Either way I saw the original back in my French Class for college and really enjoyed it. Was kind of hoping this one would at least be on equal footing with it but it sounds like it's not the case :(
Post by Willy105 (258 posts) See mini bio
Sounds like classic Steve Carrell.
Post by ox (239 posts) See mini bio
Pretty funny movie
Post by garnsr (55 posts) See mini bio
I liked the French version, but I'm not a fan of anybody in this version, so I don't think I need to see it.  The title is pretty lame, too.
Post by TurboMan (61 posts) See mini bio
just saw this. It's one of those movies with plenty of laughs in it, but nothing truly memorable(I'm having a hard time remembering half of what took place in it). Paul Rudd does Paul Rudd, but no great stuff from him, he had a better movie last year in Role Models. Steve Carrell steals the show, because Steve Carrell plays the idiot very well, and it doesn't feel like a duplicate of his Michael Scott from The Office. The best laugh does involve Chris O'Dowd.  
 
Also, the "Great Dreamers" scene with Carrell showing off his dead rat art collection is something that is kind of awe inspiring. This and the opening credits deserve lots of special mentions, because every time you see it, it's oddly beautiful.
Post by fishinwithguns (210 posts) See mini bio
I agree with pretty much everything you've written here.  I'd give 3/5 as well.  It actually seemed really short to me though, don't know why.  It's okay as far as I'm concerned, mainly because it employs more unconventional methods to get laughs.  Its attempts to get humor out of unusual situations separates it from shitty comedies like Grown Ups, etc.
 
edit: I don't know if that made much sense, I'm really out of it right now.
Post by Flap_jackson (883 posts) See mini bio

If they have a spin-off where Jonah Hill has to escort Kieran to the art gallery in San Francisco, I may cry a little inside.
Post by Diablochicken14 (16 posts) See mini bio
i really enjoyed this movie 
Dinner for Schmucks Trailer #2

Dinner for Schmucks: typical screwball summer comedy or brilliant treatise on class warfare?

Dinner for Schmucks trailer

Paul Rudd and Steve Carell reunite for this odd couple comedy where the only way to climb the corporate ladder is to do it on the backs of the entertainingly dim.

review Better Than I Expected (4 out of 5) HattieSandelson
review Funny movie, whats with the hate? (4 out of 5) DG991
review Surprisingly Not The TrainWreck I Expected It To Be. (3 out of 5) MasterPr0phet
review Carell makes this film comedy gold (4 out of 5) meaninoflife42
blog My Movie Reviews meaninoflife42
news Everything Sucked This Weekend, and Other Box Office News Alex
news We Did It! ...And Other Box Office Results Alex
review Enjoyable Carell Extravaganza (3 out of 5) electricfuture
69 votes, 3.0 avg.

  • 3.3

  • 56

  • 6.1

  • B-

  • 44
General Information Edit
Name Dinner for Schmucks
US Release July 30, 2010
UK Release Sept. 3, 2010
AUS Release
Runtime 114
Language(s)
Add a new language
Genre(s)
Add a new genre
Theme(s)
Add a new theme
Rating PG-13
Alias(es)
Top Rated Lists
Mini Reviews a list of 202 items by Winston
Summer Awards a list of 24 items by woolf
2010 Movies I've Seen a list of 100 items by Alex
Similar Movies Edit
  • In today's dollars
    Domestic $73,026,337
    Foreign +13,380,340
  • = total worldwide gross $86,406,677
  • - a reported budget of $69,000,000
  • = a 25.2% net profit of $17,406,677
Top Editors

Submissions can take several hours to be approved.

Save ChangesCancel