Glee Cast Shakeup: Lea Michele, Cory Monteith, and Chris Colfer Not Returning In Season Four

Topic started by Rorie on July 13, 2011. Last post by CherryBomb 10 months, 1 week ago.
Post by Rorie (3,214 posts) See mini bio
Staff
I find two of the people in this photo sexually desirable. I just need to figure out which two.
I find two of the people in this photo sexually desirable. I just need to figure out which two.

Few shows seem to polarize people as much as Glee does, with some considering it a guilty pleasure, others a font of awfulness, and still others (like me) a horrible vehicle to remind us that Gwyneth Paltrow desires to inflict upon us her singing. Well, get ready for another fairly polarizing moment: creator Ryan Murphy has announced that three of the show's stars, Lea Michele, Cory Monteith, and Chris Colfer, will all be "graduating" at the end of this coming season and won't be returning for the fourth season.

Any show that features high schoolers will have to deal with the inevitable graduation episodes, and there are a variety of ways to handle it. If you're largely based around a single notable character, like Buffy or Boy Meets World, you simply follow that character and his/her friends off to college after they would otherwise be graduating according to the timeline of the show. If you're more focused on the school itself, you graduate characters and bring in new actors, as I believe Friday Night Lights would occasionally do (in addition to actually flipping to another school entirely). It seems as though Murphy and his co-creators have chosen to go the latter route, which is risky but should prove to be entertaining; jettisoning some of your more popular characters and actors saves you money since you can replace them with fresh faces, but you also, well, get rid of popular characters and actors, which risks pissing off your fanbase.

The show's undergoing a fair amount of changes in the wake of adding six new writers to the staff; previously only Murphy and his co-creators Brad Falchuk and Ian Brennan were responsible for all the scripts. Murphy's also planning more serialized story arcs instead of just the standalone episodes that season two featured. Is this the moment that Glee jumps the shark, or is all this change a good thing? And how will this effect the inevitable sequel to This Ain't Glee XXX?

Post by CyleMoore (160 posts) See mini bio
Never watched the show.
Post by churrific (23 posts) See mini bio

The reason Glee got nominated over something like Community in Best Comedy eludes me.

Post by Mr_skeleton (941 posts) See mini bio

@churrific said:

The reason Glee got nominated over something like Community in Best Comedy eludes me.

They got nominated for best comedy?!

Post by Flap_jackson (883 posts) See mini bio
Is a move for the better since the show is currently a melodramatic mess? Yes, but at the same time, the actors they have now are kind of good, and are just currently given bad writing to work with. But if they don't cast it right, things could go real bad, real fast. Especially since a couple of the kids are EMMY-nominated.
Post by MrMazz (1,238 posts) See mini bio

still can't deiced which is a worse melodrama my friends are totally invested in this or Degrassi

Post by Red (480 posts) See mini bio
This article made me think of what would've happened if Freaks and Geeks lasted for long enough for Lindsey, and maybe even Sam to graduate. I am disgusted that something pertaining to Glee made me think of Freaks and Geeks, also that my generation has decided that the melodramatic, ridiculous, and unrealistically pretty characters in Glee are more relatable than those in Freaks and Geeks. As someone who has to be in high school while that show is on, I am absolutely disgusted with what it has done to my school, as well as literally everything about the show itself. Simply thinking about it makes me feel like I need a shower.
Post by TadThuggish (139 posts) See mini bio

@MrMazz said:

still can't deiced which is a worse melodrama my friends are totally invested in this or Degrassi

this. Degrassi doesn't actively ruin classic songs with autotune and rap breakdowns.

Post by skidd (2,082 posts) See mini bio

I can't say I'm a fan of the show, but to remove the 3 main stars seems kinda risky to me. It'll be interesting to see what impact, if any, this move has on viewing figures - inevitably there'll be a significant group of fans who won't like their replacements. Also this:

@churrific said:

The reason Glee got nominated over something like Community in Best Comedy eludes me.

Post by ProjektGill (300 posts) See mini bio
I tried to watch this season of Glee. I really did. But I could only make it 6 or 7 episodes in before realizing that I wasn't even paying attention to the screen and that is never a good sign.  
 
It's a good decision by the creative team because Cory is coming up on 30 and it's showing. Could be risky though because as much as this is an ensemble show, it seems to have always revolved around Lea Michele, Chris Colfer, Matthew Morrison and Jane Lynch and what happens when you lose 2 of your 4 pillars?
Post by ryanwho (1,130 posts) See mini bio
I guess its kind of funny to think straight men have been tricked into watching High School Musical: the show. Glee is metahumor, I guess.
Post by The_Patriarch (243 posts) See mini bio

They arent gonna be the only ones y'know. Theyve said theyre probably gonna remove the entire cast of graduating characters, with maybe an exception or two. Next season is gonna start introducing new characters.

I just hope this means Darren Criss can go away now. Really, really can't stand him, or Glee for that matter, or Murphys annoying sense of entitlement.

Post by ryanwho (1,130 posts) See mini bio
Dianna Agron needs to put this show behind her so she can be the girl you call when you want Scarlett Johanson or Kristen Bell but they won't go full frontal.
Post by LCad (17 posts) See mini bio
Anyone who actively trashes Glee without having seen any of it should try watching the first season from the beginning, which I feel is solidly written and features Matthew Morrison's character as the lead more often.  Rather than focusing on the quality of the music, I choose to appreciate the contextual use of specific songs making what I like to refer to as a "found musical" out of previously unrelated songs.  Jane Lynch's character is also more complex than anyone who doesn't watch gives credit for.  This year they sold out a lot more to typical high school love triangle-y stuff/pandered a lot/didn't try as hard with some of the plot arcs and song choices, but that shouldn't take away from the first season.
Post by mracoon (387 posts) See mini bio

I enjoy Glee non-ironically.

Post by MisterMouse (477 posts) See mini bio
Well I guess it will be good for some fresh faces, especially when a lot of the show revolved around those three characters. And hopefully the writers do something good with the show because I have been getting pretty sick of it.
Post by Arrested_Developer (30 posts) See mini bio

I smell a spin-off.

Post by MjHealy (128 posts) See mini bio

I will probably keep on going with Glee just to see how things shake up. If Glee back and it was way worse, I wouldn't really mind. All I kind of want to see is what direction the show is heading in.

Post by CherryBomb (1,059 posts) See mini bio
 
What about the other characters? 
I think  Brittany and Santana  should fail so they can't graduate and stay at McKinley!  
:D  they are my favourite part of the show anyway!
Post by Mistress_Redhead (2,848 posts) See mini bio
Are they not like the top three stars or something?
General Information Edit
Name Glee
Status Returning Series
Date of 1st Airing May 19, 2009
Date of Last Airing
Show Type
Original Air Day Monday
Original Air Time
Show Length 60
Network(s)
E4
FOX
Language(s)
Add a new language
Genre(s)
Add a new genre
Theme(s)
Add a new theme
Alias(es)
Top Rated Lists
Ongoing/returning shows I'm watching a list of 43 items by sanjica
Similar Shows Edit
Top Editors

Submissions can take several hours to be approved.

Save ChangesCancel