Going The Distance

Topic started by Rorie on Sept. 3, 2010. Last post by PoToSkull 9 months ago.
Post by Rorie (3,214 posts) See mini bio
Staff
Balancing crudeness and sweetness in an R-rated romantic comedy is no easy task: go too far in one direction and you have a funny movie with no heart; veer too far in the other and you have a pleasant film without any balls. The best examples of the genre-- There's Something About Mary, for instance--generally wind up with heaping helpings of “I can't believe that just happened” shock moments with just enough real emotion to make you root for the protagonists. 
 
Going The Distance seems like it tries to have its cake and eat it, too: while there's a surprising amount of relatively crude banter and behavior, it's almost evenly balanced with the travails of Erin and Garrett, two star-crossed lovers who find themselves on either side of America, attempting to make their relationship work despite being 3,000 miles apart. As a real-life couple, Drew Barrymore and Justin Long have obvious chemistry as Erin and Garrett, but their romance is slightly overshadowed by the comedic ringers that have been cast around them.

Before you can be in a long-distance relationship, though, you have to be in a short-distance relationship first, and that's where the meet-cute comes in. After a couple of frustrating days at their respective jobs (Erin is still a newspaper intern at 31; Garrett works at a record label representing a boy band called 3Z, with a single called “I Heart You Crazy Mad”), the couple meet over video games at their local bar, where Garrett pulls an unbelievable douche move in front of a Centipede machine and is forced to make up for it with beers and some of that oh-so-lovely Justin Long sexiness. (If you have any desire to see Long naked, by the way, then buy your tickets now.)
 
Alas, complications arise as Erin is forced to return to San Francisco when her internship is up, and thus begins an awkward period of the pair attempting to keep in touch through text messages and video chat (I admit that I have sent girls this same kind of video myself) while only seeing each other once every few months. Sexless relationships have their own special quandaries, of course, not the least of which are having to deal with the skepticism of your friends. Erin's sister ( Christina Applegate) and brother-in-law ( Jim Gaffigan) want Erin to be happy, and don't necessarily think that's possible while Garret's living across the country, while Garrett's mates Box (SNL's Jason Sudeikis) and Dan ( It's Always Sunny In Philadelphia 's Charlie Day) are convinced that Erin is screwing half the population of Stanford, which leads to lines like “Next time you see her, you're not going to want to be kissing that blowjob factory she calls her mouth,” and discussions about whether or not one “pops”, “snaps”, or “cracks” one's dick during masturbation ensue (despite the presence of sweet old Jewish grandmothers within easy earshot). At times it comes off as re-heated Kevin Smith, but there are a surprising number of genuine laughs on hand.
 
I'll be honest: I had no clue this was even R-rated until people started repeating the f-word far too many times for it to be anything but, and that's even before Long's ass gets shown off for the second or third time. After a summer of relatively tame PG and PG-13 romcoms, though, it's kind of refreshing to see a movie take some risks with its material. And although the pair are a bit too white-bread to be believable as passionate lovers, Long and Barrymore are still just fun to watch bounce off each other in the film's lighter moments, especially early on when they begin dating in New York. While Long may never be more than "the Mac guy" to a broad swath of the population, he's eminently likable here, and Barrymore brings back some of the trademark charm that was curiously missing from her recent rom-com efforts like Fever Pitch and Music & Lyrics.
 
If the film has flaws, they mostly relate to its failure to find much of a rhythm: there's a definite three-act structure, but with the constant flights back and forth between the two cities, it's a bit difficult to consistently hit the high and low emotional points that are required of this kind of film. Also annoying are the lengthy scenes that feature a band called The Boxer Rebellion. I don't necessarily mind when characters wear band t-shirts in films or make passing mention to bands that they like, but for the filmmakers to go so far as to feature two separate concerts of The Boxer Rebellion and then to go on to make them a critical part of the narrative ventures too far into Magnolia territory for me (another movie that threw a musician directly at your head, whether you liked Aimee Mann or not).
 
While Going The Distance has the moments of cloying sweetness that all rom-coms are legally required to incorporate, the over-the-top humor and the excellent supporting cast are what put this film above the recent spate of so-so romantic films. Even if there is a bit of deus ex machina to bring us around to the requisite happy ending, this is still a movie where love scenes are set to music from Top Gun and Justin Long promises 20% of his dick to Barrymore's character after being seated at her restaurant. Maybe those kinds of touches were intended to make this a more guy-friendly entrant into what is traditionally a female-targeted genre, but hey: it worked.
Post by Victor018 (4 posts) See mini bio
I was interested in this movie because of Charlie Day being in it so now I'm gonna go see it.
Post by Rorie (3,214 posts) See mini bio
Staff
@Victor018:  Hope you like it! He's definitely one of the funnier parts of it.
Post by pantaloons (458 posts) See mini bio
My favorite Justin Long movie?  Jeepers Creepers because I love the ending.
Post by Kovski (87 posts) See mini bio
4 of 5? I guess you really liked it then, from your rant about it in Quick and dirty it sounded like it was good but more of a "3 out 5"-way. I'm not criticizing your judging here, but even your text doesn't reflect that 4 star to me. If I interpret those words where you say it's good as in it's GOOD and not good in a "oh how good it made me feel of watching it" then I can accept it.
 
I'm just worrying a little since you've given out alot of 4 stars lately and sometimes the words and superlatives you use in some of those reviews come off so much stronger than they do here. So I just hope you know on what level you are putting this movie on. Anyways this review made the film very compelling for me to watch, thanks for the tip.
 
EDIT: I just want to inform myself that I forget that you guys ain't afraid to use the whole spectrum of the 1-5 stars so what I perhaps thinking of what a 3 and 4 stands for is perhaps more of a 4 and 5 here really.
Post by Sharpless (53 posts) See mini bio
Given the absence of wordplay related to the name "Long," I'm going to assume that Justin's nudity is not of the full-frontal variety.
Post by Rorie (3,214 posts) See mini bio
Staff
@Sharpless:  Apparently he did have a frontal scene that was cut from the movie. Alas!
Post by zoozilla (217 posts) See mini bio
Had no idea this was rated R until I read this review.  Good to know.
Post by Lydian_Sel (2,023 posts) See mini bio
I'm sure this movie is fine but I just cannot willingly bring myself to pay for something starring both Drew Barrymore AND Justin Long.
Post by LazerShow (10 posts) See mini bio
I thought the movie was pretty  good for a   romantic comedy, it didn't rely on the cheesy slapstick type comedy as much as a lot of other romantic comedies do. Both my girlfriend and I enjoyed it, which tends to be kind of rare.   
 
Charlie Day was great in it too, even though it was pretty much the same character from It's Always Sunny.
Post by Vash108 (22 posts) See mini bio
Saw this movie last night. I was surprised and I enjoyed it. It hit a little close to home from when I was in a long distance much like this and I could relate to a lot of it. Sadly mine didn't have the happy ending. 
 
Either way it was enjoyable and a good date movie.  
  
Justin turned out to be pretty funny, and I am usually not a fan of is. Drew was pretty good as well, and I cant tell if they were trying to make her look younger then she is, but you can  tell she is not as young as she once was when standing next to Justin.
Post by nofx4208 (1,423 posts) See mini bio
movie wasn't bad at all... maybe i had some problems with how the relationship was handled as well as it's believability of working, but other than that, a wholly and shockingly entertaining movie.
 
the entire time i was thinking "Kevin Smith-esque influence". I totally felt it!
Post by arab_prince (9 posts) See mini bio
Finally ended up seeing this movies. I have been subject to many romantic comedies and honestly this has to be one of my favourites. A great review Rorie but I kind of have to disagree with the flaws you mentioned. I felt geniuinely touched in some of the emotional moments. Almost brought to tears actually (yeah yeah) i guess just being in a relationship that had somewhat similar problems, really tugged on my heart strings. The acting was top notch and I think it truly depicted how the characters would be feeling. But yeah, I liked it.
Post by PoToSkull (22 posts) See mini bio

@Rorie Whats more weird that I am commenting on a year old movie that I am watching right now on HBO, or that you gave this 4 stars?

Either way great job on the website!

21 votes, 3.7 avg.

  • 6.4

  • C+
General Information Edit
Name Going the Distance
US Release Aug. 27, 2010
UK Release Sept. 10, 2010
AUS Release
Runtime 0
Language(s)
Add a new language
Genre(s)
Add a new genre
Theme(s)
Add a new theme
Rating R
Alias(es)
Top Rated Lists
Movies I've Seen Since Screened.com Launched a list of 130 items by Rorie
Movies Seen In 2011 For the First Time a list of 139 items by GreatestEver99
  • In today's dollars
    Domestic $17,804,299
    Foreign +24,248,458
  • = total worldwide gross $42,052,757
  • - a reported budget of $32,000,000
  • = a 31.4% net profit of $10,052,757
Top Editors

Submissions can take several hours to be approved.

Save ChangesCancel