• 127 Comments
  • Facebook
  • Embiggen
  • HTML 5 Theater

Half-Good: Spider-Man 3

A bafflingly bad conclusion to an otherwise stellar trilogy, Spider-Man 3 is definitely only half-good.

Video posted by JoeyF on Feb. 21, 2012

Playing Next Random Auto
Video Feature: A Look At Grown-Ups And Its Intrinsic Awfulness

Dig Deeper into Spider-Man 3

Peter Parker is forced to contend with Sandman, Venom and his old nemesis Harry Osborne, all the while dealing with the curious powers granted to him by a mysterious black entity and his relationship troubles with Mary Jane Watson. Life ain't easy for a superhero.

Edit/View the Wiki
Hit the Forums (1 Post)
Add/View Images (137 Images)
Watch Some Videos (1 Video)
JTB123on Feb. 21, 2012 at 5:27 p.m.

That half-good title card is going to take some beating.

Asokon Feb. 21, 2012 at 5:30 p.m.

I have a theory on the emo stuff. Peter was a massive nerd in high school. He was very introverted. When he was infected by the Venom symbiote, he felt the urge to act out, and didn't know how to do so. But, every time I see Toby Maquire dancing, I disregard this and yell into a pillow.

mabber36on Feb. 21, 2012 at 5:40 p.m.

@ZZoMBiE13: two was just boring. I really wanted to like it, but the fight scenes were just bland, and the drama was terrible, with parker quitting being spiderman and the relationship troubles.

no, I don't read comics, but I loved the old 90's cartoon

spiderman 3 was just a blast up till the last 30 minutes, where is does fall apart

the first spiderman is the best one. it had all the right elements, with good drama, likable characters and a great finale

MormonWarrioron Feb. 21, 2012 at 5:47 p.m.

Anybody else see the disconnect here? "A bafflingly bad conclusion to an otherwise stellar trilogy, Spider-Man 3 is definitely only half-good." A bafflingly bad movie is half good? What movie isn't "half good" according to Rorie, apart from the movies he thinks are all good? Didn't he just get through explaining how the abortive Star Wars prequels were half good?

SuperSamboon Feb. 21, 2012 at 6:03 p.m.

@MormonWarrior said:

Anybody else see the disconnect here? "A bafflingly bad conclusion to an otherwise stellar trilogy, Spider-Man 3 is definitely only half-good." A bafflingly bad movie is half good? What movie isn't "half good" according to Rorie, apart from the movies he thinks are all good? Didn't he just get through explaining how the abortive Star Wars prequels were half good?

Bafflingly bad in comparison?

Landonon Feb. 21, 2012 at 6:10 p.m.

@mabber36 said:

bullshit, emo parker was the second best part of the movie

the first being the parker vs harry fight, one the best fights ever

spider man three is way more enjoyable than spiderman two

Are you coming from a so bad it's good, standpoint?

No way in hell anyone thought emo Peter Parker was cool or scary or intimidating. He was goofy and weird.

Gourdmasteron Feb. 21, 2012 at 6:25 p.m.

i hate this movie with a burning erection, i mean passion. I remember coming out of the theater thinking it was the worst movie i had ever seen and still subscribe to that sentiment. Emo spider-man is just too much.

teekomeekoon Feb. 21, 2012 at 6:56 p.m.

When I watched this movie in theaters it was literally so FULL of stuff that sooner or later my brain winked out and I stopped caring about any of it.

fuzzayon Feb. 21, 2012 at 7:02 p.m.

Half good? You optimist, you.

AlwaysBeClothingon Feb. 21, 2012 at 7:29 p.m.

Rorie's conclusion was pretty perfect. The only way I think he would have been more animated is if there was a puppy in the movie. Then it would be Emma Stone and the puppy, featuring Spider-man

zoozillaon Feb. 21, 2012 at 7:42 p.m.

This is definitely the worst of the three Spidey films by a large margin, but at least it gave us this treasure.

I remember watching this at a cheap second-run theater, and the film literally burst into flames about 10 minutes before the end. I wasn't that annoyed.

Undeadpoolon Feb. 21, 2012 at 8:22 p.m.

I'd have to say the first one is a better candidate for "Half-Good" as this one seems more like it's "One-Fourth Good," but it's always awesome to see video features on Screened!

And yeah, after this monumental crapfest, I can't believe people were pissed that they were going for a reboot. I've said it before: Raimi was never the right guy to write/direct these movies.

whatisdeliciouson Feb. 21, 2012 at 9:19 p.m.

"Spider-Man 3 is only half-good."

That's being mighty generous. That movie is a crime against man and God.

whatisdeliciouson Feb. 21, 2012 at 9:31 p.m.

"...embarrassing Mary Jane at her place of work..."

Are you kidding me? He "embarrassed" her? Did you forget that he also hit her?

Spiritofon Feb. 21, 2012 at 9:58 p.m.

I almost walked out of the theater on Spider Man 3.

Looking back now, I wished I had.

Vortextkon Feb. 21, 2012 at 10:30 p.m.
Funny, a lot more hate for this movie than I expected, but then again I bet the tone was opposite when it came out with it being defended more heavily, can't remember. I think it's atleast half good. The first scene of the sandman coming together, the cg + music, I think is still one of the best scenes in all of spiderman and it has nothing to do with any actors at all(and I'm completely serious).
Dizzyhipposon Feb. 21, 2012 at 11:51 p.m.

Makes me wonder what this movie would of been had sam raimi not been forced to shoehorn venom into it by the studio

Jedtedon Feb. 22, 2012 at 12:39 a.m.

While Emo Spidey was pretty rediculous it's funny seeing all the women who pass by on the street look at him in disgust. I acknowlage that it's not the best in the trilogy but it's still enjoyable to watch.

If you wanna put things in perspective, Spider-man 3 is a lot better than X-men:Last Stand and Batman & Robin on the scale of worst superhero movies(atleast IMO).

Arrested_Developeron Feb. 22, 2012 at 2:30 a.m.

Rorie usually brings me around on these half-good movies but not on this one. This movie was just so terrible at points.

JackSukeruon Feb. 22, 2012 at 2:38 a.m.

I remember seeing the first Spiderman film and hoping that the series would live on long enough to get to Venom. Seeing as Venom isn't really origin story material I wagered that it would at least take two movies before they could make him the villain.

So the third movie was announced with the black spidersuit being shown and I was really excited. In retrospect, I would have easily waited another two movies if that would mean that they could've done it right instead of it becoming the mess that Spiderman 3 wound up being.

Mandatory Network

Submissions can take several hours to be approved.

Save ChangesCancel