Man On A Ledge

Topic started by Rorie on Jan. 27, 2012. Last post by VioletEyedDragon 11 months, 1 week ago.
Post by Rorie (3,216 posts) See mini bio

Man On A Ledge aspires to be something of a hybrid film, mixing the micro-locational antics of something like Phone Booth (as the bulk of the film takes place on the titular ledge of a hotel in New York City) and a heist/safecracking film that would love to think it’s in the same league as your Ocean’s Elevens or The Italian Jobs. It does neither especially well, and although its concept is sound, it fails to really exploit it any significant degree. In someone else’s hands, this possibly could’ve been a passable entertainment, but as a debut for first-time feature director Asger Leth, it limps along, attempting to rely on the ersatz charm of lead Sam Worthington to propel some semblence of tension or drive onto the screen. Unfortunately, it largely fails to deliver even the mild thrills that it seems to promise.

Worthington here plays Nick Cassidy, a former NYPD officer sentenced to a lengthy prison sentence for the supposed theft of a $40 million diamond. After a bold daylight escape from custody, he attempts to clear his name by...well, by standing on the ledge of a building and attracting massive amounts of police and public attention while his brother Joey (Jamie Bell) and Joey’s girlfriend Angie (Genesis Rodriguez) pull off a high-stakes break-in of the offices of millionaire David Englander (a slumming Ed Harris), in the hopes that the diamond, for which Englander received a sizable insurance payout for after the alleged theft, will turn up, thus proving Cassidy’s innocence.

If I seem underwhelmed and by-the-numbers in my description of the film’s plot, that’s probably because no one involved in the creation of the film seemed to wish to do more than simply go through the motions of writing, directing, and acting in a major motion picture, apparently simply to fill a slot in Summit Entertainment’s release schedule. The problems probably begin with Worthington; despite Bell’s game try at affecting a New York accent, Worthington doesn’t even attempt to cover up his Australian brogue, leading one to wonder if he was the result of some Crocodile Dundee-ish cop exchange program. He has a rudimentary amount of leading-man charisma that he trades on here, but it’s not enough to allow an audience to really give a shit about his plight; we’re told that he’s an innocent man, and are expected to care about that simply because he’s in front of our face for an hour and a half. Cassidy is less an actual character than some lazy approximation of a first draft of one.

As such, his interplay with suicide negotiator Lydia Mercer (Elizabeth Banks) is largely lifeless. Mercer is likewise given a vague sketch of a background, haunted by her failure to prevent another NYPD officer from jumping off a bridge the month previous. Does she eventually come to believe that Cassidy might actually be innocent the crime he was charged with? Of course she does, which leads her into an amazingly clichéd fight against the corrupt cops who framed Cassidy and now wish him to be silenced at all costs, etc, etc. It’s a shame to see otherwise talented actors like Anthony Mackie and Deadwood’s Titus Welliver thrown into the meat grinder that is this film's script; they’re given little to do but act as chess pieces on the board of writer Pablo F. Fenjves, also attempting his first feature film.

Fenjves has apparently seen many a heist movie, but his attempt at creating one of his own has an oddly robotic, inorganic feel; Bell and Rodriguez are assigned the unpleasant task of acting as the film’s comic relief, exchanging one-liners and sexual innuendos while a member of their family is perched on the edge of death across the street. The heist itself trades on the ideas of far better films, riffing on the Mission Impossible series more often than not, even going so far as to borrow MI3’s “take a picture in front of a security camera, print the image out, and tape it in front of said camera” gag wholesale. Leth at least has some fun with the idea of non-professional criminals attempting a heist; whenever the pair attempt to rappel anywhere via cables, for instance, they more often than not wind up dangling head over heels. Still, nothing that’s attempted here hasn’t been done before and better, even if Leth’s obsessive focus on showcasing Rodriguez’ impressive cleavage eventually becomes a welcome distraction from the humdrum goings-on of the rest of the film.

Man On A Ledge is at least competently made, with a few of the wisecracks managing to achieve a laugh and one or two of the action beats coming close to giving its audience a thrill. Saying a film is competent is a far cry from recommending that you actually pay money to see it, however, and it’s unlikely that anyone who spends 11 dollars on Man On A Ledge will consider it a wise investment afterwards. This is a film that attempts to proclaim its overwhelming averageness at every turn; it succeeds, but that success is a dubious one at best.

Post by McGhee (66 posts) See mini bio

Who would've thought that a movie about Hollywood's blandest "leading man" standing on a ledge would be a boring shit-show?

Post by zoozilla (236 posts) See mini bio

To me, this kind of looked like The Negotiator with a lesser cast and less flash. Sam Worthington just does not have the charisma of a Sam Jackson or Kevin Spacey.

Post by Napalm (350 posts) See mini bio

You fucked up, Matt! You should have reviewed Swamp Volcano instead!

Post by brownsfantb (16 posts) See mini bio

Do you think Sam Worthington is trying to go for that dumb action-guy role in an action comedy? You know where they show all of the stupid action movies he was in? Except Sam's too stupid to realize that he doesn't actually have to make those movies for real.

Post by Hot_Karl (768 posts) See mini bio

Rorie, my mom bought LivingSocial tickets to see this film, $12 for 2 tickets.

It's still worth going and not breaking her heart, right?

Post by roger778 (340 posts) See mini bio
This movie did look exciting when I saw the trailer. But, now that I've read a mediocre review for what sounds like a mediocre film, I'll need to hear some good feedback from the customers at the theater I work at.
Post by cooljammer00 (327 posts) See mini bio

Sam Worthington still trying to play American? Heh.

So this is one of those movies you can get for 6 dollars, right? And then they can report that more people paid than they actually did?

Post by Chop (80 posts) See mini bio

@McGhee said:

Who would've thought that a movie about Hollywood's blandest "leading man" standing on a ledge would be a boring shit-show?

All that needs to be said

Post by oscar (1 posts) See mini bio

"So there's this movie about a man on a ledge. It's called..."

Hollywood is not even trying anymore.

Post by President_Barackbar (525 posts) See mini bio
@McGhee said:

Who would've thought that a movie about Hollywood's blandest "leading man" standing on a ledge would be a boring shit-show?

I really don't know why he is such a hot property in the film industry. His acting is pretty lifeless, his emotion isn't there, and he cannot affect an American accent to save his life. Why does Hollywood keep insisting we care about him?
Post by WilyBoy (10 posts) See mini bio

To be fair, the “take a picture in front of a security camera, print the image out, and tape it in front of said camera” concept is not original to MI3, either. It is used in the, um, "brilliant" international spy film Danger: Diabolik, a movie that was the subject of Mystery Science Theater's series finale and was parodied for the Beastie Boys "Body Movin" music video.

Post by sunalso (44 posts) See mini bio

I thought the concept was really great when I saw the trailer, it's too bad the actual movie sounds so blah. I also could not remember for the life of me what else Sam Worthington had been in- I had to look at his page here on screened.com to remember that he's the dude from Avatar- that's how rememberable he is in any role.

Post by DXmagma (125 posts) See mini bio

I am tired of these mother fucking men, on these mother fucking ledges!

Post by leebmx (9 posts) See mini bio

@WilyBoy said:

To be fair, the “take a picture in front of a security camera, print the image out, and tape it in front of said camera” concept is not original to MI3, either. It is used in the, um, "brilliant" international spy film Danger:Diabolik, a movie that was the subject of Mystery Science Theater's series finale and was parodied for the Beastie Boys "Body Movin" music video.

I know I saw this in some 70's heist movie set in a tower block as well. It may have had Sean Connery in it and there was a scene where after they have fooled the camera with a photo they climb along the celing with magnets because the floor is alarmed - wish I could remember what it was called.

Post by steelknight2000 (102 posts) See mini bio

Smells like January.

Post by Vonocourt (323 posts) See mini bio

Watched it and seemed like the idea process behind it was like "Hey if we slam Dog Day Afternoon with just the heist part of any heist movie, it'll be the best thing ever right?!" Too bad they half-ass both parts.

Post by Rorie (3,216 posts) See mini bio

@VinceNotVance said:

Rorie, my mom bought LivingSocial tickets to see this film, $12 for 2 tickets.

It's still worth going and not breaking her heart, right?

I wouldn't spend on money on it, but if the damage is done, hey, maybe she'll like it?

Post by Rorie (3,216 posts) See mini bio

@leebmx said:

@WilyBoy said:

To be fair, the “take a picture in front of a security camera, print the image out, and tape it in front of said camera” concept is not original to MI3, either. It is used in the, um, "brilliant" international spy film Danger:Diabolik, a movie that was the subject of Mystery Science Theater's series finale and was parodied for the Beastie Boys "Body Movin" music video.

I know I saw this in some 70's heist movie set in a tower block as well. It may have had Sean Connery in it and there was a scene where after they have fooled the camera with a photo they climb along the celing with magnets because the floor is alarmed - wish I could remember what it was called.

Yeah, I realized today it has probably been in more movies than just MI3. But that's the one that almost everyone who sees Man on a Ledge will also have seen; one would think that they would've come up with something slightly more inventive.

Also, this movie thinks that fire extinguishers can actually freeze things into solid blocks of ice. That's its own special kind of dumb.

Post by leebmx (9 posts) See mini bio

@Rorie said:

@leebmx said:

@WilyBoy said:

To be fair, the “take a picture in front of a security camera, print the image out, and tape it in front of said camera” concept is not original to MI3, either. It is used in the, um, "brilliant" international spy film Danger:Diabolik, a movie that was the subject of Mystery Science Theater's series finale and was parodied for the Beastie Boys "Body Movin" music video.

I know I saw this in some 70's heist movie set in a tower block as well. It may have had Sean Connery in it and there was a scene where after they have fooled the camera with a photo they climb along the celing with magnets because the floor is alarmed - wish I could remember what it was called.

Yeah, I realized today it has probably been in more movies than just MI3. But that's the one that almost everyone who sees Man on a Ledge will also have seen; one would think that they would've come up with something slightly more inventive.

Also, this movie thinks that fire extinguishers can actually freeze things into solid blocks of ice. That's its own special kind of dumb.

Yup they are both spectacularly bad ideas that only the movies could pretend would ever work.

10 votes, 2.1 avg.
General Information Edit
Name Man on a Ledge
US Release Jan. 27, 2012
UK Release Jan. 27, 2012
AUS Release Feb. 2, 2012
Runtime 102
Language(s)
Add a new language
Genre(s)
Add a new genre
Theme(s)
Add a new theme
Rating PG-13
Alias(es)
  • In today's dollars
    Domestic $18,620,000
    Foreign +24,024,373
  • = total worldwide gross $42,644,373
  • - a reported budget of $42,000,000
  • = a 1.5% net profit of $644,373
Top Editors
Mandatory Network

Submissions can take several hours to be approved.

Save ChangesCancel