When It's Midnight in Paris, Magical Dreams Come Alive

Topic started by WesleyFenlon on Feb. 1, 2012. Last post by cexantus 3 months, 2 weeks ago.
Post by WesleyFenlon (24 posts) See mini bio
Staff

Here is a familiar story: a young hero abruptly leaves his normal life to go on an adventure of discovery, or self-discovery, or escape. This journey could transform the world around the hero or send the hero to an alternate fantasy land that mirrors our own. And, in the end, it's all a dream...but maybe real, at the same time. We've seen that ending time and again: reality asserts itself, but with a wink and a nod the film plants a seed of doubt. Inception ends on a wobbling top. Pan's Labyrinth blurs the line between the fantasy world and our own.

Midnight in Paris is nothing like those films, though it seems to be at first.

Woody Allen wrote a delightful romance in Midnight in Paris by doing something very simple: avoiding the storytelling tropes we naturally expect. Midnight in Paris is about love, but it's not a love story. It's wrapped within a heartwarming aura of magical realism but avoids the genre's tendency for introspection.

Just a word of warning: there be plot spoilers ahead!

Owen Wilson plays Gil, a Hollywood writer who loves his fiancee almost as much as the city of Paris. He loves the streets, the rain, the restaurants, the people. He's enraptured. Paris is perfect. Gil's impassioned monologues about Paris lend the city an air of fantasy, like a high school sweetheart transformed into a lost soulmate by the passage of time and rosy tint of nostalgia.

After a subdued opening that establishes Gil as a nostalgic dreamer, Midnight in Paris quite suddenly transitions into the realm of magical realism. Gil travels back in time.

Woody Allen gives Gil a few moments to process his casual time traveling.
Woody Allen gives Gil a few moments to process his casual time traveling.

Magical realism blends the fantastic with what we know to be real. In film, magical realism often manifests in the form of impossible things happening to normal people. Harold Crick finds himself the protagonist of a novel in Stranger Than Fiction. Twin Peaks uses magical realism to establish a mysterious, hyper-surreal setting. The genre spans literature and film and takes many different forms, but this definition best gets to the heart of what magical realism can accomplish as a storytelling technique:

It is a fusion between scientific physical reality and psychological human reality. It incorporates aspects of human existence such as thoughts, emotions, dreams, cultural mythologies and imagination. Through this amalgamation, magic realism can be more exact in depicting human reality.

All of this becomes important the moment Gil steps into an old-fashioned automobile at the stroke of midnight and finds himself delivered to a party in the Roaring Twenties. Socialites Zelda and F. Scott Fitzgerald happily tour Gil from one happening joint to the next. Gil loves it; he gets to live in the decade of prolific artistic creativity he so nostalgically pines for. And after a chat with none other than Ernest Hemmingway, Gil wanders back onto the streets and returns to his own time.

Was it all a dream? An allegory for Gil's inner conflict? That question would become the driving force behind most works of magical realism, or at least a lurking mystery always dangling just out of reach. When a film is fully immersed in magical realism--when fantasy elements are present from the very beginning--characters often accept their environment at face value because that's how the fictional world has been constructed. But when magical realism is introduced midway, injected into a previously normal world, we expect characters to react and question. We expect the film to acknowledge that what's going on is pretty weird, and most writers delight in leaving the mental state of the protagonist ambiguous.

Woody Allen provides an answer within ten minutes. Gil goes back in time. Period.

This is what makes Midnight in Paris so charming: it unquestioningly embraces the impossibilities of magical realism, using them to explore Gil's character, and tosses aside any attempt to distinguish between fantasy and reality. From a narrative perspective, magical realism becomes pure realism. Allen devotes exactly two scenes to the natural skepticism surrounding time travel, then allows Gil to accept what he's found and live in the moment. And there's not even a chance Gil's meant to be an unreliable narrator, dreaming up all of his Parisian adventures: he isn't the only one to take a stroll into the past.

Gil harbors a deep, aching nostalgia for the Paris of the past, and magical realism allows Woody Allen to bring that nostalgia into the frame and study it from all sides. Would Gil truly be happier living in the past? In the end Midnight in Paris leaves us with two seemingly conflicting ideas. Nostalgia is a natural feeling that we all must learn to accept and move on from, yet there are still happy endings out there for even the dreamiest of dreamers.

Gil has the chance to befriends his heroes...but gradually comes to realize that the magic is in Paris itself, not the luminaries of the 1920s. The city he loves changes relatively little in 90 years. There's romance in Paris no matter the century, and you don't even need a magic automobile ride to find it.

Post by boocreepyfootdoctor (52 posts) See mini bio

I heard Woody Allen used to lock himself in the bedroom with Mia Farrow's three year old adopted children. And then he married his own daughter. Refreshing take on love?

Post by Dylabaloo (790 posts) See mini bio

Weird coincidence, I was just watching the Inception Blu-ray extra about dreams. I absolutely loved this loved, probably my favourite film of 2011. I loved in particular how they didn't bother to explain how Gil went back in time. Can''t wait for this to come out on dvd.

Post by Red (481 posts) See mini bio

A great film for sure, makes me want to check out some more of Woody Allen's back-catalog. I just love how whimsical it all is, and how it doesn't bother with any complex explanation for its time travel. As someone who went to France and hated it, this movie makes me actually regret not visiting Paris.

Post by Vincemaster (384 posts) See mini bio

I loved how the movie embraced the magical realism element as real. That was my favorite part. And best of all, I didn't even know it was going to happen because I avoided all the advertising for the film. Really great movie, and this essay does a good job of summing up what made it so great.

Post by theodacourt (241 posts) See mini bio

@boocreepyfootdoctor said:

I heard Woody Allen used to lock himself in the bedroom with Mia Farrow's three year old adopted children. And then he married his own daughter. Refreshing take on love?

That sounds boo creepy, foot doctor!

Post by garnsr (56 posts) See mini bio

If it hadn't been Owen Wilson I might have disliked this movie less. I've seen all of Woody Allen's movies, and liked most of them, but this one really just put me off.

Post by SmokeYou (114 posts) See mini bio

Loved this movie.

Post by Hot_Karl (768 posts) See mini bio

Best film of 2011.

There, I said it. Yes, that includes Drive.

Post by sunalso (44 posts) See mini bio

I loved this movie so much, but then as a teen a was really into the Lost Generation. I did typical teenage stuff- lock myself in my room and read as many of Hemingway's short stories as I could fit in a day and think "deep thoughts." I really felt like I connected with Picasso's art, and of all strange things my Dad rented a house decorated entirely with Dali prints during this time. So Gil going back in time feels like me going back to those years.

Post by Nicked (49 posts) See mini bio

I enjoyed Midnight in Paris, and I liked the way the "magical realism" was handled, but overall I think it's a ham-fisted movie that overwhelming insists on stereotypes in almost every aspect.

The "magic" or "romance in Paris no matter the century" comes from a totally Americanized view of 'French-ness'. This is a movie about tourists for tourists. People call out Michael Bay for making dumb movies that are only good for their action scenes. Well, Midnight in Paris is the Transformers 3 of rom-coms. It hits all the right notes for what it is, but it's all surface level. The Paris that's presented is utterly sanitized and totally lacking in depth. The entire film is sanitized.

I know it's an unpopular opinion, but I really think this film is inessential and in no way exceptional. I apologize if I came off as too harsh, because I did have a good time watching it, but I don't understand why people think it's so phenomenal. Am I being too critical? Should I just lay back and appreciate it for its whimsical whimsy-ness?

Post by InfamousBIG (83 posts) See mini bio

I fucking loathe Owen Wilson, but he was tolerable in this movie as he was straight fucking up playing Woody Allen.

I didn't like this movie as much as so many people do (though I did have a good time watching it). It's shallow; Gil's girlfriend and family are just such fucking intolerable stereotypes while hipster-ish "free love" Wilson is clearly the level head in this magical wonderland of Paris. Heads up, from someone who's been to Paris. It's a fucking city! There's crime, there's dirt, there's hookers. It's not a magical wonderland.

Sure, not every depiction of a city has to be the New York of Taxi Driver. But, fuck, man. It's just the whole movie seems so two dimensional in its depictions. Gil's girlfriend and her parents are just such assholes, for no apparent reason...it's basically as if Woody Allen was sitting next to you in the theater the whole time, screaming, "LOOK AT THESE REPUBLICANS! THEY'RE ASSHOLES, HUH? HUH? NEUROSIS IS FUNNY, RIGHT? BABBLING INCOHERENT INCOMPETENCE IS ENDEARING, RIGHT?! MAN I LOVE MYSELF!!!!!"

And of course it ends with the surrogate Allen getting with an improbably hot chick, cause, ya know...

it's a Woody Allen movie. And I guess I'm just done with those at this point.

Post by Vincemaster (384 posts) See mini bio

@Nicked: Do you generally like Woody Allen and his movies? Your level of tolerance of his brand of filmmaking could certainly affect the way you feel about this movie. One of the reasons that I really enjoyed it was because I connected to the stuff about art and inspiration that Gil was dealing with. It was pretty inspiring and uplifting to me. Also, are you yourself American, or French, or some other nationality? I am American, and although I can see how you would say that Allen romanticizes the portrayal of Paris, when I went there (albeit for a very short time) I found it to be every bit as magical as Gil did in the movie. But then again, I'm from America, and I'm not used to Europe, so I might have just been enraptured with the sheer differentness of it rather than the city itself. But one of the parts of the movie that I enjoyed the most were the beautiful shots of Paris and Gil's musings on how a city is like a work of art. So I guess I really did enjoy it for the whimsical whimsy-ness. I can see how you would dislike it, I'm just wondering what you would think a more realistic, less Americanized portrayal of Paris is like? Sorry that whole comment was really ramble-y.

Post by Aarny2 (126 posts) See mini bio

Something about the real look at nostalgia made me think. This film is so right about nostalgia that bitch.

Post by Rudeboy217 (28 posts) See mini bio

Midnight is Paris is probably in my top three of 2011, along with Tree of Life and The Artist.

Post by gramblor (5 posts) See mini bio

I'm a huge Woody Allen fan. He's my favorite filmmaker; favorite comedian; favorite famous person. He's indisputably a genius, and his senses of both the comedic and tragic move me like none other's. That said, I don't understand why so many have chosen this movie to embrace, ignoring many of his better movies. Midnight in Paris is not one of his great artistic successes. There are plenty of amusing moments, but mostly it's boring, and the cavalcade of two-dimensional stereotypes gets tiresome almost as soon as it starts. Even the first scene of the movie, a montage of Paris sights (that recalls the much better opening New York montage in Manhattan) overstays its welcome.

Overall, I think Midnight in Paris is an okay movie. There are always redeeming qualities in a Woody Allen movie, for instance the hilarious interactions Gil has with his obnoxious know-it-all acquaintance Paul, the professor (was that his occupation?). But, all you have to do is look back to 2010's Allen film, You Will Meet a Tall Dark Stranger, for a superior experience in almost every way.

Post by gamefreak9 (26 posts) See mini bio

I haven't seen it yet though some of the description reminds me of the video game Braid... the feeling its evoking.

Post by WesleyFenlon (24 posts) See mini bio
Staff

@InfamousBIG: Inez and her parents/friends are very flat characters, but their impending marriage isn't really the focus of the movie overall. Their relationship is secondary to the portrayal of the city and Gil working through and understanding his nostalgia. They're one-note for comedic effect because the movie is not a romance in the way we expect going in. It definitely surprised me--not what I expect out of Rachel McAdams--but their portrayal came to make sense as the focus of the movie presented itself.

Post by Nicked (49 posts) See mini bio

@Vincemaster: Thanks for the reply! I think part of my problem is that I'm focusing too much on the stuff the film isn't, rather than what it is. Insofar as it works to romanticize Paris (and some other stuff), the film does a really good job, but I feel like there's so much more to say than what the film says. It wasn't trying to provide an in depth examination of life in Paris, it just focused on one way that people envision that city. I think that certain things could have been better explored without the romantic aspect (Gil/Inez/Adriana, that is, not 'romanticization')

Regarding Gil's musings on Paris, I don't recall specifically what he says, but I think at one point he mentions the idea of 'all people coming together to give the city life', or something. Stuff like that seems totally disingenuous in that it ignores the darker aspects that are in any given city. The movie wouldn't have been better with more drive-bys and coke dealing, but as I mentioned, the film felt very sterilized. Gil's characterization (and therefore our point of view) is such that Paris becomes this flawless ideal city and Allen never challenges that. The 50's is a utopia for Gil and the present becomes a utopia. As a tourist, Gil is understandably naive, but I felt like it was an oversimplified look at a city.

Also, all the present day stuff really turned me off, and I don't like it when writers are characters in films.

Sorry I kind of digressed a little bit there! The point is I think you're right. My arguments are a matter of personal taste and I was less willing to admit that before. For the problems I had with the movie it manages to keep me thinking.

Post by Mumrik (20 posts) See mini bio

I was thoroughly disappointed by this movie. I'm not much of a Woody Allen fan, but I had pretty high hopes for this movie. In the end it got a "meh" from me. Why was just about every character (including Wilson's) a flat, simple and annoying stereotype? It was a constant annoyance to me. I saw no depth anywhere and the plot was extremely predictable.

58 votes, 4.3 avg.
General Information Edit
Name Midnight in Paris
US Release May 20, 2011
UK Release
AUS Release
Runtime 100
Language(s)
Add a new language
Genre(s)
Add a new genre
Theme(s)
Add a new theme
Rating PG-13
Alias(es)
Top Rated Lists
MOTY 2011 a list of 10 items by AssInAss
Favorite Films a list of 130 items by Paper
My Five Star Movies a list of 30 items by obscurefan
Related Pages Edit
We don't have any info about Midnight in Paris's related cliches. Help us fill it in!
  • In today's dollars
    Domestic $56,817,045
    Foreign +91,860,584
  • = total worldwide gross $148,677,629
  • - a reported budget of $17,000,000
  • = a 774.6% net profit of $131,677,629
Top Editors

Submissions can take several hours to be approved.

Save ChangesCancel