Maybe you’ll always see whatever flicks you grew up on as being inherently better than the modern equivalents kids are enjoying now (even if they probably do look about the same, in the long view, to the unbiased viewer.) Nostalgia’s a real hard thing to rise above, so we’ll temper this discussion by saying that the wave of sci-fi movies profiled here isn’t necessarily better than those that have followed it; but its flavor is still markedly different.
By my reckoning, this golden or silver age of cinematic SF began with Alien, concluded with Alien3, and RoboCop 3 was the first flick to mark that it was over. This period’s comprised of movies like Aliens, Total Recall, Blade Runner, nearly all of John Carpenter’s movies and the first entries in the Terminator, Predator and RoboCop series. They all shared a sensibility tied up in the manlier action films of the time. They had a rugged toughness. They were hard-minded about their fantasy. They always had an element of horror. Their leads generally had a charming meanness. Their comic relief came with an acidic, satirical sneer, not a wink or a tongue in cheek.
Aesthetics defined these flicks considerably. They really picked up the “lived-in future” notion pioneered by Star Wars and ran so far along with it that, most of the time, you were liable to forget that the tech and the locations were designed by effects studios and not actual engineers with a whole host of real scientific considerations.
The Auto-9, the M41 Pulse Rifle, the Phase Plasma Rifle with a 40-watt range… they were all purposefully-designed, credible weapons that wouldn’t look out of place at a Heckler & Koch product showcase. When fans built their own Power Loader in their garages or illustrated cross-sections of ED-209 or worked out what design flaws Skynet likely had to overcome on the way from producing the T-600 to the T-1000, you figured they were simply picking up on all the thorough “imagineering” the movie crews had already done. Indeed, these flicks' attention to detail bordered on fetishistic.
Chalk a lot of this verisimilitude up to how a lot of these flicks shared the same personnel. Not only was it a time when a breed of concept designers and creature artists like Ron Cobb, Stan Winston and Rob Bottin truly reigned, it was also when directors like James Cameron, Paul Verhoeven and Ridley Scott were working out particular techno-fixations. Truly, this was the zeitgeist of the specific time, since that latter trio's later visits back to the genre like Hollow Man and Avatar haven't ever had quite this same attitude about their worlds (although perhaps Prometheus may be a return to form.)
One needn’t look at immediate spiritual successors like Independence Day, Waterworld or the Fifth Element and debate where the changes to the genre are - - thery're right there in all the sequels produced from RoboCop 3 onward. Alien Resurrection, Terminator 3, AVP, et al, all have markedly lighter tones and poke bemusedly at the world-building latticework their previous installments were so intense about setting up. Whether that's OK or not really depends on how seriously you took all this made-up stuff in the first place.
So why the change? It probably had a lot to do with external pressures. The senatorial hearings on the harmful effects of entertainment that started in the 80's by focusing on heavy metal and gangsta rap turned their attention to action flicks around this time. It got a little harder to reconcile RoboCop with his Saturday morning cartoon or the Xenomorphs with their action figure line. Hence, "hard R" sci-fi flicks slid down to "light R" and PG-13 sequels, and the leash likely curbed spirit just as much as behavior. In a lot of ways, the premise of RoboCop 2 (where Robo has to play nice according to 300 poltically-correct directives) came true for him and his pals.
Don't misunderstand - - there's been plenty of good sci-fi after this wave. They've been trippier, though; more fanciful. Their leads aren't an anxious command away from being outright killing machines; nor are they mothers who'll go to scary, psychotic lengths to protect their cubs. None outside of probably Pitch Black have embodied this particular quality of bleak, borderline-misanthropic danger in their characters and scenarios.
Was this a golden age of movie sci-fi? That's entirely up to your own taste regarding such speculative fiction. It was a distinct era, at the least, though- - one that stands in ever-greater contrast when put next to the flicks that followed it.





























First.
Segundo.
I'm gonna go ahead and guess why Tom thinks that era ended: 9/11.
EDIT: Not as I jokingly expected. Good. Nice article.
What about Starship Troopers?
they created too many "me too's" diluting the genre until it became a mine field.
remember "i come in peace" the dolph lundgren rip off of Predator?
alien: "i come in peace.."
dolph: "and you go in pieces." *explosion*
That era ended when companies got greedy and decided to make all of their shit PG-13. Yeah.
Sci Fi is awful right now. People keep trying to sell this Firefly show and I am not buying it. There has been nothing better in the Sci-fi genre since maybe the Fifth Element that I can think of. Also James Cameron stopped laying the smack down in the Sci Fi genre for a while. Also I would like to give an honorable mention to the Roy Scheider classic '2010'.
How about 'District 9' as a return of serious Sci-fi? That movie really shows attention to detail.
from that time period was definitely some of my favorite films and definitely favorite sic-fi films
Spot on observation and good article. Points made I didn't realize but points I totally agree with.
There have been some gems, mind you, in recent years, regarding Sci-Fi movies but certainly the trough has been dried up for too long.
Awesome article. Its sad but true.
I love 80's Sci-fi films. My favorite was Robocop (I even enjoyed the sequels). I do agree that will probably never be anything like Sci-Fi films from the 80's (also wtf does this topic relate to Predator 2?)
Where's the mention of Blade Runner that's OBLIGATORY for an article like this? Or Akira, if we're to look at the eastern side of things?
EDIT: @frythefly: Wrong time period, plus it was VERY much a tongue-in-cheek satire.
Well, as CG budgets went higher they need their bigger audience to cover it... so I guess that justifies the PG-13 ratings lately.
Doesn't justify jack to me, though!
@Makoto_Mizuhara_Sakamoto said:
Come to Anime Vice on Friday - - I'm doing a long feature on exactly what you're thinking.
@frythefly said:
That fits into a gray area. The sensibility about tech and location is there, certainly, but the whole movie's basically this huge joke that Verhoeven's playing on the audience. The cast of 90210 going to war. A little similar to RoboCop, perhaps, but it pushes the conceit into a far more farcical direction.
Perhaps this is why District 9 felt like such a great movie to me. It is one of very few decent Sci-Fi films to have come out lately. Never quite knew where the story line was going, and it felt incredibly well realised. Look forward to the prequel and eventual sequel. I almost want to stock up on cat food.
@Tom_Pinchuk: I'll be sure to try to.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hardware_(film)
No mention of Star Trek II?
One possible reason for the "lived-in" look to the sets was to prevent the movies looking too clean and artificial like a Flash Gordon or Star Trek TV shows.
There is a common dystopian theme running throughout all of those movies, and the gritty, second-hand used look enhanced that theme perfectly. Those movies were also a product of social trends at the time. Post Cold War, post-vietnam, the war on drugs, distrust of large corporate / institutional bodies etc. The heroes and heroines of most of those movies were fighting against something that was superhuman and untouchable.
Movies like Moon, Wall-E and District 9 are certainly a return to that dystopian future setting, and there will certainly be more to come.