When the rumors first started surfacing that Chuck Norris was in Expendables 2, I was pretty skeptical: the first film was a fairly hard-R, with language that would make a nun blush in all her special places, and Norris' image is decidedly family-friendly, and I doubt he would disagree with an assessment that his politics are somewhere right of center, as his online political columns should bear out. I take no issue with his political stances, but I was immensely curious as to how he'd match those stances up with his appearance in a movie that features some pretty intense violence and language.
As it turns out, he might not have to, as he may have exerted a bit of influence to force the movie down into a slightly more palatable (to him) PG-13 rating. This is one of those translated interviews that seemingly always wind up being miscontrued, so take this with a grain of salt, but this is ExpendablesPremiere.com's translation of a bit of a Polish television interview Norris did:
In Expendables 2, there was a lot of vulgar dialogue in the screenplay. For this reason, many young people wouldn't be able to watch this. But i don't play in movies like this. Due to that I said I won't be a part of that if the hardcore language is not erased. Producers accepted my conditions and the movie will be classified in the category of PG-13.
One of the commenters over there went through and re-translated, and got essentially the same message:
In Expendables 2, they had a lot of hard language in there that prevent young people from going to see it, and I said I don't do movies like that. I might have done them in the past(?), I didn't do it in those TV series. I said if you can't take out all the language, hardcore language, you know... I can't do it. So they did, and they made it a PG-13 film so kids can go see it.
Obviously a PG-13 rating would also rather drastically cut down the chance that we'll see Dolph Lungdren cut a man in half with a shotgun blast, so it wouldn't just be the language that would be affected. It'd be hard not to imagine Expendables 2 being rather emphatically de-fanged were it actually rated PG-13 instead of R. That doesn't necessarily mean that it'd be bad, of course (and to be fair I'm sure the studio would be happier with an easier-to-sell PG-13 film), but it would necessarily be far less brutal than its predecessor.
Personally, I'd be happy to have no Chuck Norris and an R-rating. What do you think, though?
UPDATE: Sylvester Stallone confirmed this rumor to AICN:
Harry, the film is fantastic with Van Damme turning in an inspired performance... Our final battle is one for the ages. The PG13 rumor is true, but before your readers pass judgement, trust me when I say this film is LARGE in every way and delivers on every level. This movie touches on many emotions which we want to share with the broadest audience possible, BUT, fear not, this Barbeque of Grand scale Ass Bashing will not leave anyone hungry...Sly




























$5 says you wouldn't call Chuck Norris a little girl to his face.
I will not watch Expendables 2 if it's PG-13.
I like Chuck Norris as much as the next guy but jeez, I'd rather he wasn't in it and we got the real version.
I really don't like Chuck Norris and this has nothing to do with it. If it's PG-13 maybe they'll cut out all the bad CG blood also that made the first hard to watch.
I hope they just cut the language from his part and just edit in a bunch of cursing. This is about as sucky news as I could hope to hear from movieland.
Hey, Chuck! It's called ACTING for a reason. Just because you ACT like a thing, doesn't mean you are that thing. If an ACTOR PORTRAYS a rapist, a priest, a demon, an angel, a ladies man, an homosexual, a cop, a burglar, a medic, a killer, a lawyer, a worker, a mentally challenged person, a sports guy, a slob, a devout man, an adultherer, etc., doesn't mean he is seen as one, because people know that they are seeing a MOVIE, where ACTORS are ACTING. People know that what they are seeing is a controlled location and not real most of the time. People know they are seeing a REPRODUCTION of something, and NOT a REALITY SHOW. If you don't like saying things a CHARACTER would say in a MOVIE, then why the Hell did you want to be an ACTOR in the first place??!?! For example, I know that on most movies you are ACTING like a badass, but I know that in REAL LIFE you are like a pussy.
FUCK CHUCK
*drops mic*
The Expendables was great because it was a loving throwback to the violent action movies of the 80s. But the sequel is now an allegory for what the state of Hollywood action films are now. Used to be violent R rated now everything is all PG-13.
"Least funniest Chuck Norris joke"? Hardly, it merely ties with every Chuck Norris joke ever made.
Well my interest in this movie just left the building.
If this is true I'm not going to bother with this or any future Stalone movies. Isn't this his baby?
Welp, I'm out.
Don't know why actors are afraid of a hard R these days.
I was planning on seeing this but with this development, I think I'm going to reconsider.
The only reason Chuck Norrs is in the movie is because of a meme that everyone got bored of years ago. By putting him in they're going to damage the whole picture.
I don't think Stallone would let them tone it down but hey wierder things have happened
@FinalDasa: whats he gonna do, twat me with his zimmer frame??
fuck Chuck Norris, i now refuse to watch this film and i was so so sooooo looking forward to it. Chuck, i damn you to fucking hell you bastard!