Several weeks ago Netflix released 13 episodes of their powerhouse original series House of Cards, all in one day. It was a bold move for the streaming service, but with big Hollywood names like David Fincher attached to direct and Kevin Spacey and Robin Wright to star, they were pretty sure they would have a hit on their hands. However, the biggest controversy was that Netflix has stated that they will not release any ratings for the show. They claim they are a subscription-based service and immediate numbers are not what are important. Rather, it is more important that anytime in the next 6 months, their viewers sit down and binge watch all episodes. However, while not giving specific ratings, Netflix has declared that House of Cards is now the most streamed piece of content in the United States and 40 other countries. Sounds like a success to me.
With that success comes the question of how this will change the television business in the future? In an article back in October, I explored they ways in which network and cable television have been rapidly changing recently. With the addition of cable and hundreds of alternate networks, broadcast television is having trouble keeping up and the ratings for their shows are dwindling before our eyes. The Walking Dead is poised to possibly win 2013 as the highest rated scripted drama on television…yet it’s not a network show. That is a huge departure from when cable shows were barely in the game and seen as a smaller business model. Now, I can't help but wonder if cable television will soon be marginalized as well. After beginning my House of Cards marathon, I immediately became very excited because I suspect I was actually watching television history happen before my eyes. In many ways this felt like the tipping point of when a digital streaming content model will actually be able to exist. It might not happen right away, but this will allow other companies (such as Amazon Prime who just announced they are entering the game) feel confident that they can successfully produce original content and audiences will be there to watch. Now, the question remains will they be able to monetize extremely expensive shows such as House of Cards and not only make them successful with the audience, but help make money for the streaming service. As I believe there is some time before that question will be answered, I am not going to focus on that at the moment and instead would like to discuss how House of Cards actually is a breakthrough series and its type of content.
Without having to exist within the established television model, House of Cards creators were able to really break free from the confines of the traditional ways of producing content. First of all, by having more of a focus on the streaming, binge viewer they didn't have to write or tell stories in the same manner. The focus was not on building a cliffhanger that makes a viewer wants to tune in and come back every week, but rather a model that would make a person want to immediately watch the next episode. I found that especially true in the first three episodes of the season, which ironically were he ones directed by Fincher. The experience was likened to watching an incredibly long movie that had built in stop breaks at the end of the hour. When reaching the end of an episode, there was enough resolution that you could stop and feel satisfied with the hour of television your had just watched. Alternately, you could turn on another episode and feel as if it was simply a continuum of what you were just watching. It was a fascinating experience and one I thoroughly enjoyed…at first. After several episodes I began to feel that everything was dragging a bit and I was ready for a little conflict resolution. I'm not sure if that was an issue in the writing of the series that became lost and uneven in the middle, or if it was the new way they were attempting to tell this story. It also could be the problem that while you are expecting to watch the series more like a film than a series, the fact that series episodes have different writers and directors was really felt. However, in the last five episodes, the excitement returned, as did the desire to binge watch. In fact, I was late to a dinner party because I couldn't bear to not finish the season in that one sitting as it would have felt like turning off a film in the middle.
Similarly, because House of Cards did not have to adhere to a specific airtime or allow room for commercials, they didn't have to write episodes in the same manner as a traditional series or be edited to fit within a set amount of time. Hour long dramas that are air on television are around 46 minutes long and must be edited to fit within that time. Many times some of the best jokes or most dramatic moments are cut and edited in a series, simply because they don't fit. With the streaming model, shows don't have to worry about this and can skew several minutes either way depending on what is creatively best for the episode. That is a rare freedom that is not afforded to most series.
For this reason, I think this new format will also be very important, as it will attract high-level talent, actors, writers and directors who will want to explore new ways to tell stories. Since David Fincher and Kevin Spacey were attached to this huge new venture, it will be easy for other big name actors and directors to attach themselves to series with streaming content models. John Goodman has already signed on to star in Alpha House from Amazon and they are also developing the hit movie Zombieland into a series. They also don't have to listen to critiques or notes from network television executives or "suits", and I have a feeling that might be one of the biggest draws for many frustrated creatives. I don't think it will be long before the next big name director is attached to produce and direct parts of a new series and personally I am very excited to see who it will be. Netflix already has their next big play lined up with the return of Arrested Development in May and I have a feeling this will only solidify this new content model and way of telling stories as it has been anticipated by very rabid and cult-like fans for years.
Now, while looking at all of this the next question might be, "Well, is House of Cards good?" Whether the series is successful and great as a whole is something I still have yet to figure out. It is a fascinating show to watch and I couldn't turn my eyes away which is a rare thing for a series and at the very least indicates it is entertaining. I don't know that I ever found the passion for it that I have for say Breaking Bad, The Walking Dead or even Mad Men. Don’t get me wrong, I think the series is better than most out there (especially after seeing the new crop of shows that aired this season) and if Kevin Spacey isn't a shoe in for an Emmy, I will lose more faith in their system than I already have. I am sitting on the edge of my seat waiting for next season, which is always a good sign. It almost felt like looking at a beautifully crafted piece of art that you know is good and you really like looking at it, but it just didn't hit you in the heart and become one of your favorites.
However, I think no matter if you enjoy it, love it, or hate it, it is a very important series to watch. Whether it is the beginning of the digital streaming revolution or simply the tipping point that leads to the next business model, it is a series that will be talked about for months and years to come. For that reason, I implore you to watch and get excited that things are changing and moving into a direction that will actually appeal to new audiences and create content in a creative, sophisticated manner. More than anything it is an indication of where things are going and I hope at the very least you can be interested in that fact. I know that I am.


































The real question isn't "Will Spacey walk away with the Emmy" but rather: Are they even eligible for an Emmy in the first place? It's not strictly "broadcast" television, and as far as I know the only Emmy a web-generated content has taken home was Dr. Horrible's Sing-Along-Blog, which had a special technical award (not even a proper Emmy).
That said Spacey and Fincher are exactly right: We don't want content delivered to us in bite-sized chunks anymore. We want to be able to absorb content in bulk. House of Cards has proven this model makes sense for our modern schedules (and I suspect Arrested Development will bear it out further).
I'm not buying House of Cards as the inflection point, entering things into a new post-post-network world. Not to make a quality comparison but House of Cards is the Netflix what Oz was to HBO.
I'd argue House of Cards and Netflix's content plan is more an extension of the HBO boom of the early 2000's and the idea that TV has gone post-network. House of Cards was original conceived as a premium cable series as such it has stuck within the confines of premium cable. House of Cards is still content that was effected and shaped by the current constraints of television, even if it is slightly removed. You say that because of the Netflix first broadcasting it can refrain from a more episodic style of pacing, taking something more akin to a novel's approach. Which they did to a certain degree. But, Reed Hastings talked about in this GQ feature.of 15 minutes episodes and then 50 minutes ones whatever the story needs. This type of thing is akin to webseries, which is technically what HoC is. House of Cards run time did vary from about 45-50 minutes but that is because Netflix isn't the only place for House of Cards. It was sold in international markets as regular ass TV.
For Netflix to really differentiate itself beyond being an extension of premium cable model it needs to have whole owned unique content that you literally can't get on cable or DVD. House of Cards isn't that, it's a cable show that they won the bidding war on. The early talk of what "season 4" of Arrested Development was going to be as a webseries appeared to skew more towards traditional web series and less traditional sitcom. It now sounds like they are going with a traditional sitcom format which is probably the right move for something calling itself Arrested Development.
This isn't to be disingenuous about the importance of Netflix being in the original content game. Another place offering to finance and produce what we consider television is a good place. House of Cards just isn't revolutionary. It's slightly off brand cable that if it were put on HBO or Showtime would probably receive not nearly the same kind of attention and praise. It would be a middling HBO series to me.
I'd say David Milch would be a good fit for Netflix but he would still have to deal with some kind of production schedule.
What did you think of episode 8? I thought it was largely a waste of time, and interesting peek inside the character but he pretty much goes back to being old Frank the next episode.
@MrMazz: My whole point is that this series helps enter a Post-Network era. I'm not saying it is the end all and be all and where it will end up, because there is always a slow progression of change, especially entertainment. What I'm saying is it is the first thing that has actually showed that there is a possibility of a post-network era and companies outside of networks can begin to explore series in different formats. I actually don't even want something that is completely different. I love television series and how they are told. I just appreciate that this has opened up a new world to be explored. Creatively the constraints put on by networks effect a series more behind the scenes than you can imagine and I really felt that difference greatly, no matter the history of how the show was developed or aired internationally. I'm sure we will hash this out more in a podcast. :)
I don't want to say too much about episode 8, because I want to keep this thread spoiler-free, but I thought it was interesting to get back story on his character...although it could have been developed even more.
@abominabledoctorpickles: There was an article I read that House of Cards is absolutely eligible to win an Emmy.
"Thanks to a 2008 rule change, the Academy of TV Arts and Sciences allows shows like Netflix's House of Cards and Arrested Development to be nominated for Emmys in the same categories as broadcast and cable contenders; that means a show that isn't regularly scheduled on a linear TV channel might wind up competing against broadcast and cable shows for one of Emmy's top series awards."
http://www.tvguide.com/News/How-Netflix-Internet-Might-Impact-Emmy-Awards-1061208.aspx
However since the inception of this rule change, no such show has actually won. EDIT: Been nominated in a major category is more correct.