Screened News

Industry 101: Film Budgets Part I

The first part of a look at film budgeting in Hollywood.


Due to budgetary constraints, Tobey was forced to go maskless for the duration of the film. 
Due to budgetary constraints, Tobey was forced to go maskless for the duration of the film. 

For the next few Industry 101s, I’ll be delving into the world of film budgeting to discuss where all the money actually goes. I’ll also be taking a look at other things, such as cost-cutting measures and marketing blitzes in future articles in the series.

I want to start with a very general breakdown of a film budget to give you an idea of how the average Hollywood blockbuster spends it money. But, first, a pretty big disclaimer... Film budgets are a very fluid thing. Depending on the type of film being made, costs can be distributed in a variety of different ways. For example, a small indie film will usually pay its actors scale (the lowest amount possible based on SAG regulations), which allows them to put more money into hard production costs. I’m going to use the budget breakdown for a much larger film, Spiderman 2, partially because the numbers were so readily available from Guardian, but also because it's very easy to follow.

Films always incur costs before they even go into production. These begin with the script. Typically, a writer makes somewhere around 5% of the film's budget for writing and developing the screenplay. If there’s more than one writer, the studio usually tries to distribute that 5% amongst them. But, like all things, that 5% isn’t a hard figure and can vary from film to film. In the case of Spiderman 2, $10 million was spent on the script and its development. Sony also had to pony up about $20 million for the licensing to the webslinger from Marvel. So, the film’s budget was already at $30 million before filming even began.

But, the major costs of a big summer flick like this are almost always going to be associated with the salaries of the cast and major crew. Director Sam Raimi received an upfront payout of $10 million, while the producers made an estimated $15 million. The cast was paid about $30 million, with Tobey Maguire getting a huge payday of $17 million for the sequel. Keep in mind these figures don’t take into account escalators and backend deals written into all of their contracts. Add that all up and you have about $55 million dollars of the budget going to cast and above-the-line crew. For those of you that don’t know, above-the-line refers to costs are incurred before filming begins. Below-the-line refers to expenditures incurred during actual filming (basically the hard production costs), which can include non-star roles, catering, grips, locations, equipment, make-up artists, cinematographer, etc. The below-the-line budget for Spiderman 2 was $45 million. The everyday costs for a huge production are usually enormous. You’re talking about hundreds, or sometimes even thousands, of people being employed, most of which you not only have to pay but feed as well. In total, Spiderman 2 spent about  $100 million on the actual production itself.

Finally, you have post-production. Spiderman 2 was heavily effects driven, which showed as they shelled out $65 million for special effects. The film's score and soundtrack came in around $5 million. All in all, $70 million was spent on the film’s post-production.   

For those of you keeping score, this adds up to a budget of $200 million dollars. This number doesn’t include other major costs such as marketing and distribution. Those figures are never included in the actual budget, but I’ll talk about them in a future article. As you can see, movie making can be an extremely expensive business. Feel free to start up a discussion or ask any questions below.

tds418on Dec. 8, 2010 at 6:30 p.m.
That 200 million is on the high end of things, isn't it? Even for a summer blockbuster, I don't hear of many movies spending that much before promotion. Either that or I'm even more ignorant of movie financing than I thought!
circleon Dec. 8, 2010 at 6:44 p.m.
Tobey Maguire got 17 mil? Studio got riiipppeddd offfffffff.
frytheflyon Dec. 8, 2010 at 6:46 p.m.
Great article as always. I get my budget informations from the-numbers.com, but they don't break it down in that detail. Spiderman 2 on the-numbers.com.
Darkstornon Dec. 8, 2010 at 6:52 p.m.
Excellent read. I've always wondered what goes into making films from a monetary standpoint - keep up the good work!
AndrewGodoski staff on Dec. 8, 2010 at 6:54 p.m.
@tds418: It's on the high side, yeah. But it's about right for a big studio's summer tentpole.
theodacourton Dec. 8, 2010 at 7:18 p.m.
Does that figure include the cost of the sets, explosions, costumes etc.? I presume the Below-the-line budget includes that, but how much of the $45 million is on hard items for filming and how much are the wages. I've always thought that at least in olden times with Demolition Man for instance, that blowing up that huge building at the beginning probably cost a lot of money no matter how they worked it.
Popcornon Dec. 8, 2010 at 7:25 p.m.
$17 mil to pretend to be someone else? Man, I need to get in this acting thing!
Xpgamer7on Dec. 8, 2010 at 7:38 p.m.

wow. Pretty high numbers all around in the movie buisness.
Aetheldodon Dec. 8, 2010 at 7:39 p.m.
@AndrewGodoski:  First ...YAY!!! I been waiting for this 101 and you sir delivered :) , second holly Moses Jesus Mary over $200 millions????!!!! O_O thats just crazy , why would someone pay Toby $17 mil? He is not like on the level of say Al Pacino or Robert De NIro , his acting is dull (ok fine I admit hated all Spider Man films) Sam got $10 ? So how many more Evil Dead films can he do now which such a salary :P?  How crazy this is , and really are such amounts of cash that justified? I mean , Im not saying they should pay minimum wage or anything , but how many more movies could been made with that much?
StealthMaster86on Dec. 8, 2010 at 7:49 p.m.
@aetheldod:
Sometime when a film makes big bank, like the First Spider man for instance, the lead star can start making more money. Jim Carry was earned 20 million just to be in The Cable Guy because of the successes of the Ace Ventera films, The Mask, and Batman Forever. It doesn't matter the star it only matters the investment.
JoelTGMon Dec. 8, 2010 at 7:54 p.m.
man they throw money around like it's nothing!  the amount they're paying people is enough for them to retire several times over and live like a king.  
Aetheldodon Dec. 8, 2010 at 8 p.m.
@StealthMaster86:  I know but still :( , I want to make films but seeing this figures just make me feel sad , because how in the friigin world could I afford such figures i know that this is the big budgets summer blockbusters , but I think they only help to inflate filming costs , which to the aspiring film makers makes it harder to play the game .... Im waitng to see how much goes to other expenses like silly sindicates/guilds  etc. ; but my hopes are way down :(
theberserkeron Dec. 8, 2010 at 8:15 p.m.
10million for a script? 
 oh hollywood...
Gambit1024on Dec. 8, 2010 at 8:22 p.m.
So THAT'S why he barely wore his mask. 
AndrewGodoski staff on Dec. 8, 2010 at 8:46 p.m.
@theodacourt: Yeah, it includes all of that. It's hard to say how much goes to what, because it really depends on the film. Something like Spiderman has a huge workforce and the cost to maintain it over the duration of shooting would be immense. It really just depends. The price of blowing stuff up depends on what exactly is exploding. Taking out a building is obviously going to cost a lot more than destroying a car.
AndrewGodoski staff on Dec. 8, 2010 at 8:49 p.m.
@aetheldod: Well, a lot of it is because they didn't make all that much (by film standards) in the first movie. Sam Raimi and Tobey Maguire weren't the huge box office draws they became after the first Spiderman. Another good example of this is another director, Jon Favreau. I believe he made $500,000 for the first Iron Man, which is pretty cheap considering the type of movie Iron Man was, not to mention its wild success. They paid him a lot more for Iron Man 2 to make up for that.
sociald1077on Dec. 8, 2010 at 9:04 p.m.
@aetheldod said:
" @StealthMaster86:  I know but still :( , I want to make films but seeing this figures just make me feel sad , because how in the friigin world could I afford such figures i know that this is the big budgets summer blockbusters , but I think they only help to inflate filming costs , which to the aspiring film makers makes it harder to play the game .... Im waitng to see how much goes to other expenses like silly sindicates/guilds  etc. ; but my hopes are way down :( "
 
Just remember: Clerks was made for $27,000. If you have a clear vision and the determination to make it happen, you can make your own film.
Feseron Dec. 8, 2010 at 10:23 p.m.
@theberserker said:
"10million for a script?  oh hollywood... "

Writer's typically live off of one big paycheck. For instance, I think the average screenwriter gets paid 250k a year, but since he his not working every year you can divide that 250 several times to get his yearly average wage. And considering how crucial the story is (You kinda need it) 10 million is worth it.
BjornTheUnicornon Dec. 8, 2010 at 10:24 p.m.
Just a question regarding special effects and how it relates to budget(sort of): 
With District 9 having a budget of $30 million yet still having spectacular special effects, was that practically because most of the budget went into production, and all the post came in at a huge discount because of Neill Blomkamp's relationship with Peter Jackson, pretty much garnering Weta as Blomkamp's special effect playground? 
Danyon Dec. 8, 2010 at 10:41 p.m.
@BjornTheUnicorn said:
" Just a question regarding special effects and how it relates to budget(sort of): With District 9 having a budget of $30 million yet still having spectacular special effects, was that practically because most of the budget went into production, and all the post came in at a huge discount because of Neill Blomkamp's relationship with Peter Jackson, pretty much garnering Weta as Blomkamp's special effect playground?  "
I doubt WETA would be 'discounted' even for a friend of jacksons

Dig Deeper into Spider-Man 2

Peter Parker has to decide to either stay a superhero or lose everyone he loves in the critically acclaimed sequel to Spider-Man, starring Doctor Octopus as the main villain.

Edit/View the Wiki
Hit the Forums (1 Post)
Add/View Images (70 Images)
Watch Some Videos (1 Video)
Netflix Instant Update for May 16th

A few animated shows are leaving but a few more are coming in to help replace those cartoon filled nights.

About Last Night: Revolution "The Longest Day"

A long day to look back and realize all your interpersonal relationships are more dysfunctial than the Bluths.

TNT/TBS the First to Start Streaming

Time Warner now offering full streaming for two of their more popular channels.

Angry Birds will be a Movie

Sony Pictures now holds the rights to the huge downloadable title.

Riddick Trailer

The trailer for the third film is this trilogy looks pretty badass.

What To Watch for Wednesday, May 15th

Wednesdays start to pick up the pace in terms of things to watch.

What To Watch for Thursday May 16th

Despite every show ending their seasons, there still is something to watch on Thursdays.

Screen Addict Has an Extra Long Take on Great Gatsby

Watch a not so 60 second review of The Great Gatsby.

Angry Birds will be a Movie

Sony Pictures now holds the rights to the huge downloadable title.

Netflix Instant Update for May 16th

A few animated shows are leaving but a few more are coming in to help replace those cartoon filled nights.

TNT/TBS the First to Start Streaming

Time Warner now offering full streaming for two of their more popular channels.

Full Pacific Rim Trailer

The full trailer is released and this monster/robot movie looks better and better.

Riddick Trailer

The trailer for the third film is this trilogy looks pretty badass.

Last Vegas Trailer

Remember how you didn't want a Hangover 3? Will how about with old people?

TV Upfronts, By The Numbers

The Upfront report is back to give you a quick rundown about the state of network TV.

Director Movie Club: “Goodfellas”

People say it’s the greatest mob picture of all time, and Martin Scorsese’s best film. Are they right?

Recent Reviews
Mandatory Network

Submissions can take several hours to be approved.

Save ChangesCancel