Screened News

Is Star Trek Anti-Religion Or Merely Ambiguous About It?

There's a lot to talk about when discussing the intersection of Star Trek, religion, and spirituality.

In Star Trek, God isn't always looking out for you. Quite the opposite, in fact.
In Star Trek, God isn't always looking out for you. Quite the opposite, in fact.

I love me some Star Trek, I’m not going to lie. It’s science fiction, sure, but it always, when it’s at its best, has been interested in telling stories about the world as we know it. Even though it pushed its metaphors a bit too far at times (Vulcan AIDS, anyone?), Trek has often had trenchant and sometimes profound things to say about modern-day race relations, politics, and culture. Its commentary on religion, however, has often been problematic. There’s a tone of dismissal in the way the show sometimes portrays people of belief; a snooty air of disbelief that people in the 24th century could actually believe in a deity. But is Star Trek anti-religion, or merely skeptical about it?

A lot of its odd attitudes about religion, at least early on, has to do with the influence of Gene Roddenberry, who once famously stated:

Religions vary in their degree of idiocy, but I reject them all. For most people, religion is nothing more than a substitute for a malfunctioning brain.

Producer Brannon Braga later noted:

[Roddenberry], himself, was a secular humanist and made it well-known to writers of Star Trek and The Next Generation that religion and superstition and mystical thinking were not to be part of his universe. On Roddenberry's future Earth, everyone is an atheist. And that world is the better for it.

Earth religions still appear here and there in Trek, but generally only in passing, as when Picard celebrates Christmas with his family in Generations, or the occasional biblical quote used to make a point; priests are said to still officiate weddings, and Chakotay’s ambiguous mysticism indicates that at least some humans cling to a belief in something more than science. Two consistent story devices offer up a more fertile ground to examine Trek’s theories of religion, though: the persistent notion of false gods throughout all of the various series, and Deep Space Nine’s look at the conflict between organized religion and spirituality.

False Gods

One of the ways Roddenberry broached the topic of religion in the 1960’s (when expressing overt atheism, as he did above, would’ve essentially guaranteed his show an early end) was through the use of the “false god” plot. This plot actually recurs throughout all of the various incarnations of Trek, but it’s particularly common in The Original Series. A backwards society is kept in thrall to a more advanced species or imposter, who blind them to the truth of the universe with technological shadows and mirrors. Among the episodes that employ this methodology are “Return Of The Archons,” where a 6,000-year-old computer (does that number remind you of anything?) is revealed to be mimicking a culture’s chief prophet, until Kirk manages to convince it to destroy itself; an almost identical storyline plays out in “For the World is Hollow and I Have Touched the Sky,” and “The Apple.” In “And The Children Shall Lead,” a telepathic alien kills the adult members of a colony and keeps their children in its thrall by allowing them to play all day long, until they’re freed by Kirk’s intervention. In “Plato’s Stepchildren,” a race that exhibits apparently supernatural powers is found to merely be under the stimulating effects influence of the local food supply. This basic plot recurs in around ten different TOS episodes.

The false gods plot recurs in The Next Generation and onwards, of course, with episodes like TNG’s “The Devil’s Due,” where a con artist impersonating a culture’s most feared devil attempts to wrest control of an entire planet by making them think that their world is coming to an end, or Voyager’s “False Profits,” where two Ferengi imitate mythical gods to cow the local population of a planet after crash-landing there. Perhaps the most famous example of this is the TNG episode “Who Watches The Watchers?,” wherein Picard angrily refuses a doctor’s suggestion that he attempt to enact positive change on a primitive culture by pretending to be a god:

It’s difficult not to relate this recurrent use of false gods back to Roddenberry’s views of real-world religion. Was he asking people to reflect on the Occam’s Razor as applied to religion? Is it more logical to believe that Jesus actually possessed the ability to perform miracles, or that he was some kind of alien, possessed of near-magical technology? Or was he simply implying that it’d be better to throw off the shackles of organized religion, no matter how painful the realization that our Gods were all robots might be? It’s a curious repetition: the idea that religion deprives members of a society of free will, and in fact replaces it with slave-like worship of mere idols, and idols that are almost always corrupt, at that. Roddenberry might not have been able to be explicit about this message in The Original Series, but the repetition of the theme makes his point for him.

At any rate, William Shatner got the message, when he directed and co-wrote Star Trek V, perhaps the apotheosis (pardon the pun) of the false god plot, in which the Enterprise tracks down and kills God.

Deep Space Nine: The Zealous Faithful

My favorite of the various Star Trek series is, by a fair margin, Deep Space Nine, which also contains perhaps the most detailed look at the religious aspects of far future societies. Because it was able to embed the religious peccadilloes of the Bajorans across seven seasons, rather than having to deal with it in a single episode, and perhaps also due to the death of Roddenberry before the series went to production, the representation of religion was generally more sympathetic on DS9 than it had been on previous Treks, but that’s a kind way of saying that it was improved from a general stance of “religion is always wrong.”

It’s interesting that the series seemed poised to examine the intricacies of the Bajoran religion for the entirety of its run, and then, to boost ratings, sidetracked itself into Dominion War (which wound up being completely awesome, so heck if I mind). What’s perhaps most interesting about the Bajoran religion, based upon a belief in the presence of gods who lived in a wormhole near their home planet, was that their belief was actually proved correct, in contrast to the con men and trickery behind most Star Trek religions: there were, indeed, supernatural beings inside the wormhole, which manifested themselves to Captain Sisko, and which were powerful enough to be effectively godlike. (More precisely, we might say that the issue of belief or faith is never one that needs to be raised.) Which raises the question that helped define the relationship between the scientific Starfleet and the pious Bajorans: is there a difference between a godlike alien creature and a god? (In the case of the Q, which come as close to gods as Star Trek has ever really gotten, that difference might be that they evolved into their powers over time, having once been mere mortals; the Prophets were left rather ill-defined in this regard.)

Busy day, plotting deaths, betraying the faithful, but Winn's got time for it all!
Busy day, plotting deaths, betraying the faithful, but Winn's got time for it all!

The interplay between the Prophets and the rest of the universe was sometimes inconsistent and at other times silly, but the writers of DS9 took a more careful look at the politics of the religion itself, planting pious but open-minded Bajorans like Kira against the orthodox, intolerant, fundamentalist majority, as represented by Kai Winn, who was willing to bomb schools and attempt assassinations on her political rivals to stay in power. The organization is not much different from the 16th-Century Catholic Church that the Assassin’s Creed games mock so well: everyone wants to be pope and is willing to do almost anything to ensure that they, and not their enemies, assume the office. It's not all bad, however, with Kai Opaka acting as a serene presence early on in the series, and with many Bajorans, like Kira, having used their religion as a source of solace during the long period of Cardassian occupation.

Winn, however, is one of science fiction’s great religious bogeymen. Sci-fi at its worst has often treated religious populations as hypocritical extremists, and Winn, despite her over-piousness at the beginning of the series, does eventually betray all of her beliefs over a combination of jealousy that a human could possess the ability to communicate with her gods while they leave her out in the spiritual cold, so to speak, and her own admitted and lifelong spiritual emptiness. What’s worse, she eventually came under the thrall of the Bajoran devils, the Pah-Wraiths, and almost led the entire galaxy into damnation by releasing them from their prison. It’s a little sad that Louise Fletcher, best known for her Oscar-winning role as Nurse Ratched in One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest, is also mainly noted among genre enthusiasts for a role possibly even more monstrous.

In the end, DS9 upgraded Star Trek’s treatment of religion from “mostly contemptuous” to “ambiguous with a hint of disdain.” (It’s worth noting that the series couldn’t help inserting another example of false gods, in the form of the Founders and their drug-addled worshipers the Jem’Hadar.) Like much of the treatment of Vulcan spiritualism throughout various Trek series (but especially in Enterprise), the end stance would appear to be that spirituality can be a force for good in the life of an individual, and perhaps even a society, but that organized religion often leads to corruption, discrimination, and hypocrisy.

What’s The Verdict?

It’s obvious that Star Trek, even after Roddenberry’s passing, has never been overly enthusiastic about religion as a force for good, but as time has passed, the producers and writers of the shows that followed his death warmed up to religion - to a degree. Is Star Trek anti-religion? If you take The Original Series into consideration and average out all of the opinions offered on religion throughout all of the films and series, the answer is almost definitely yes; if one considers only the episodes produced after Roddenberry’s passing, though, we wind up with interesting looks at the religions of the Bajorans, Vulcans, and Klingons that lead to a significantly more ambiguous view of the role of religion in the lives of the people living in the Trek universe. As far as the human species goes (with the possible exception of Voyager’s Chakotay), however, the only religion that really matters is, of course (given the genre), science, the solution to every problem encountered, great or small.

That doesn’t mean we can’t have faith, though...faith of the heart.

tonedaforceon May 11, 2011 at 6:38 a.m.
I don't think the writers after Roddenberry death warmed up to religion because the show was sofing it's stance on the subject, I think it was mainly used for plot purposes. You want to fill in a back story of a new culture, give them a religion and progress from there. Religious conflict can be good for the 'drama'.
Catastrophicon May 11, 2011 at 6:43 a.m.
I think so it's just inviting people to question first or give it a thought, rather than just discarding right away.
Tartaruson May 11, 2011 at 6:58 a.m.
There is a contrast between the Roddenberry Star Treks like TOS and TNG and the rest of the shows as regards to religion. I never felt that TOS or TNG were ever out right saying religion was bad it was more to do with the truth, if they could find the truth behind a religion then there is no point in keeping the lie. In these shows they was almost always a lie which the religion was based on as you pointed out. They certainly didn't like religion,but it was never out right smacking you over the head with it (to my knowledge).

The rest of the series continue this mainly in DS9 were the Gods are real and tangible, for the most part. All the relics of the Bajorian religion actually work and effect the universe hugely. Although the characters don't like religion they don't mind people practicing it. Sisko doesn't like it and hates being the emissary at first. He eventually seems to enjoy the spirituality of it and respects the Bajorians religion. Its interesting though in the likes of DS9 and all the series that what makes a God is often questioned. The Founders for instance are seen as Gods by the Jem’Hadar but perhaps for good reason, the Jem’Hadar have reason when they are with the founders and the drugs bring order when they would normally be aggressive and unreasonably violent. The Founders use them but given them purpose and give them life (cloning), does that make them God? The wormhole aliens aren't really any different, they may have shaped and altered the Bajorians  throughout history and indeed they change the  history of the Galaxy when they shut the wormhole down. Are the Bajorians any better than the Jem’Hadar? 

Voyager has some religion both for and against. For starters Chakotays is set up to be pretty much real isn't it? I mean he goes on "spirit quests" and such so thats a for. Then there was that episode were the Klingon woman literally goes to the afterlife for an episode. On the other end there was the episode were Neelix dies for like 20 mintues and when he comes back he loses his faith because there was no afterlife. Thats all I can really think of in Voyager.

Really I think the lesson Star Trek tries to tell is that we should question what religion is actually about and not blindly follow it. Kai Win is an example of using it for evil, the false Gods of the rest of Star Trek use if for similar reasons to exploit people beneath them. Yet even in Star Trek 5 the religion that  Sybok is peddling is actually pretty helpful to people like McCoy and the rest of the crew its when he blindly follows it to the false God and doesn't question what is going on does it become dangerous and stupid. That false God once again try's to exploit those under him. It more like Star Trek is fine with spirituality but not deity. For the most part though its about understanding and questioning and finding the truth even when you don't want to.

I didn't actually mean to write that much I just thought this was a kinda interesting subject and I probably know more about Star Trek than I should. Thats just my take on it but whatever. On a  personally level I find that the idea that religion is inherently bad or is the sole reason people do bad things to be childish and unrealistic. 
Purple_Proletariuson May 11, 2011 at 7:02 a.m.
As a guy who knows nothing about Star Trek, this was a good read. I'm going to check out some of these episodes to form my own opinion...
ArbitraryWateron May 11, 2011 at 7:05 a.m.
Excuse me, I have a question. What does god need with a starship?
bricewgilberton May 11, 2011 at 7:06 a.m.
The two quotes you posted pretty much sum it up in terms of the philosophy of the show in my mind. Anything else that happens on the shows came about through wanting to make interesting stories. It's obvious why Ron Moore wanted to directly deal with religion on BSG since the Federation society had no place for them. I can see both sides as storytelling tools. I personally subscribe to the Star Trek side of things, but sometimes it can be boring if all your characters believe the exact same things... that being said there are plenty of shows where no one believes in Unicorns. It's obvious that Roddenberry wanted a distant future to treat Gods in the same manner. There is no word for people who don't believe in Unicorns, but there certainly is for Gods.
HT101on May 11, 2011 at 7:18 a.m.
This is a great article and I really can't wait for when DS9 shows up on Netflix so I can watch it straight through.
Olivawon May 11, 2011 at 7:34 a.m.
Actually, the first thing I think of when I think of Star Trek's religious messages is "Rightful Heir", in which Kahless, the Klingon messianic figure who promised to return, actually returned. But the core premise is about Worf's search for spiritual meaning.

Of course it turned out to be a clone made by the high priests of the homeworld and imprinted with the teachings of Kahless, which causes Worf a great deal of consternation since he was all ready to jump on the Kahless bandwagon, but they didn't do it to steal power (despite Galron's insistence that they did), they did it because they felt that without someone like Kahless to lead them that the Empire would dissolve into civil war again. So in the end they all agree to make him a figurehead emperor to lead the people by example and give speeches and shit.

And then at the end the clone of Kahless says to Worf,

Kahless left us, all of us, a powerful legacy. A way of thinking and acting that makes us Klingon. If his words hold wisdom and his philosophy is honorable, what does it matter if he returns? What is important is that we follow his teachings. Perhaps the words are more important than the man.

I'd say that's about as positive a message about religion as you'll find in Star Trek!
snake_runneron May 11, 2011 at 7:39 a.m.
I'm curious to see how they approach religion in the Star Trek reboot.
wiIIon May 11, 2011 at 8:33 a.m.
Can god create a cup of " tea, earl grey, hot" so hot that god can't drink it?
Spiritofon May 11, 2011 at 8:44 a.m.
Maybe I'm just wishing it into existence, but didn't Ronald D. Moore have a bit of a falling out with Rodenberry and the Trek universe over Rodenberry's insistence on keeping religion out of his shows? I thought I saw/read an interview with Moore saying something about BSG being his outlet for all the things he wasn't allowed to do on Trek. Then again, maybe it was just a personal epiphany.
VicRattleheadon May 11, 2011 at 9:01 a.m.
must admit i really do enjoy reading your star trek related articles...
Sharpshooteron May 11, 2011 at 9:31 a.m.
Anyone remember the season 3 episode of Enterprise called Chosen Realm where the ship was hijacked by religious extremists wired with suicide bombs, who wanted to use it as a weapon in their holy war. 

Part way through the episode they reveal the reason the two sides went to war was that one side believed the "Makers" took 9 days to create the universe altering spheres and the other thought it took ten days.

Safe to say after they got done with the Bajorans and the Prophets they went back to the "RELIGION IS EVIL" stance.
JuMPon May 11, 2011 at 10:31 a.m.
@SpiritOf: I too, could be conjuring this up, but I thought Moore's falling out with Trek happened after DS9 finished, and he briefly switched over to Voyager. In fact, nevermind that conjuring, because here's an article that talks about how everything fell apart, mostly with Brannon Braga.
thabigredon May 11, 2011 at 10:31 a.m.
A more egalitarian word is Irreligion than anti-religious and I think conveys the point of this article.
TehJedicakeon May 11, 2011 at 10:32 a.m.
Hopefully.
400lb_Gorillaon May 11, 2011 at 10:41 a.m.
God Dammit Rorie, now that song is going to be stuck in my head all day long.
ganglyon May 11, 2011 at 10:44 a.m.
Sure Roddenberry was an out and out atheist, but I don't think those values of his were completely forced into the Star Trek universe. Or at least his vision of future Earth.

It's really just a practical fact that an United Earth government is impossible if belief in multiple organized religions remain the pervasive mode of thought.
cheeseknighton May 11, 2011 at 10:53 a.m.
I am disappointed this hasn't been posted yet.

  
  
jasonefmonkon May 11, 2011 at 11:07 a.m.
I hope the new Abrams series keeps a secular tone. It's a very appealing part of the franchise.

Dig Deeper into Star Trek V: The Final Frontier

Capt. Kirk and his crew must deal with Mr. Spock's half brother who hijacks the Enterprise for an obsessive search for God.

Edit/View the Wiki
Hit the Forums
Add/View Images (37 Images)
Watch Some Videos (1 Video)
What To Watch for Thursday May 16th

Despite every show ending their seasons, there still is something to watch on Thursdays.

Full Pacific Rim Trailer

The full trailer is released and this monster/robot movie looks better and better.

TV Upfronts, By The Numbers

The Upfront report is back to give you a quick rundown about the state of network TV.

Badass Digest: The Summer Movie Blockbusters

Devin Faraci sits down and discusses the burgeoning summer blockbuster season.

Let's Talk About The Office: "Finale"

The Office is now in reruns so let's look back and what it was.

What To Watch: Weekend Edition May 17th

The weekend has the best stuff on TV, every time.

What To Watch for Tuesday May 21st

Not much on a Tuesday night but there is a season finale.

Netflix Instant Update for May 16th

A few animated shows are leaving but a few more are coming in to help replace those cartoon filled nights.

Netflix Instant Update for May 16th

A few animated shows are leaving but a few more are coming in to help replace those cartoon filled nights.

Full Pacific Rim Trailer

The full trailer is released and this monster/robot movie looks better and better.

Disney/Lucasfilm Announce New Animated Star Wars Show

There won't be anymore clones but Disney wants to stay in the animated Star Wars arena.

Anchorman 2 Teaser

It isn't much but it is our first look at the returning characters of Anchorman 2.

Director Movie Club: “Goodfellas”

People say it’s the greatest mob picture of all time, and Martin Scorsese’s best film. Are they right?

DVD/Blu-Ray Releases for May 21st

There may be a lot of Blu-Rays released but only a few you should really care about.

TV Upfronts, By The Numbers

The Upfront report is back to give you a quick rundown about the state of network TV.

Last Vegas Trailer

Remember how you didn't want a Hangover 3? Will how about with old people?

Recent Reviews
Mandatory Network

Submissions can take several hours to be approved.

Save ChangesCancel