Screened News

Twenty-Five Years Later: Predator

"We make a stand now, or there will be nobody left to go to the chopper."

EDITOR'S NOTE: This will now be a recurring feature where we will take a look at films that have a major anniversary this year and how they have stood the test of time.

This is what happens when you aren't pushing pencils for the CIA.
This is what happens when you aren't pushing pencils for the CIA.

There’s no mistaking which decade Predator was made in. Things from the 80s seem to have a certain stink about them—you can tell a song from the 80s within the first few bars, and movies are not dissimilar; we pick up on these things almost instinctively, even if we weren’t alive to experience that decade first hand. A movie like Predator, released in 1987, fully exudes this feeling. As an action film Predator is somewhat behind the times now—though it is still capable of entertaining the viewer—but twenty-five years after the fact it’s interesting as a document of what action filmmaking once was, and what the genre eventually became.

Predator is, for the most part, an utterly ridiculous film. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s motley Minoriteam crew is little other than an assortment of walking, talking clichés. The early action sequences exist solely as Michael Bay-level high-octane entertainment. (My favorite example is when Schwarzenegger’s company comes across a village where hostages are being held. They brazenly open fire on the village, blowing it up and razing it to the ground, only to find that—surprise—none of the hostages survived.) The one-liners are devastatingly crude, and every close-up of Schwarzenegger ‘acting’ is appallingly bad. Despite that, and to its credit, Predator is enthralling, albeit very much ironically. It is in the 2 Fast 2 Furious mold: we know it is not a particularly good picture; nonetheless we dare not look away.

Schwarzenegger's motley crew of soldiers.
Schwarzenegger's motley crew of soldiers.

Perhaps that’s because Predator is a bona fide slice of 80s filmmaking. Take its devotion to action film clichés, for instance. It’s almost as if Predator’s producers had a list of every trite prosaism and were determined to check off as many boxes as possible in the space of two hours. Among the best is the inclusion of an all-knowledgeable, totally infallible Native American—a shameless incarnation of old stereotypes. He has premonitions of future danger; he seeks out tracks in the jungle mud; he connects with the spiritual plane. Incidentally, has it ever happened in film that a shaman’s premonitions turned out to be wrong? But my favorite cliché is the boneheaded solider played by Jesse Ventura, an all-muscle red-blooded American type. Ventura’s character informs us that he “doesn’t have time to bleed.” Unfortunately, he is among the first to perish.

Less sardonic is the way in which the film’s score is implemented. Most of Predator is backed with a prominent orchestral score. Even dialogue-heavy scenes are trapped beneath a constant bed of music. Parts of the score are excellent, and were even reused in later 20th Century Fox films (most notably Die Hard), but silence is at a real premium here, which is the opposite of what we expect from a film today. Predator has downbeat moments—a soldier sneaks through the jungle, trying to spot the Predator—but they are rich with music. In today’s films such sequences would be soundless, in order to instill tension and fear into the audience. The audience should fear the Predator as much as the soldiers. But that feeling never manifests in Predator—the score is a wall between the film and the viewer; it feels as though we’re being held at arm’s length, repelled by the bombastic and obtrusive music. This is very much an artifact of the 80s. Die Hard or Lethal Weapon can similarly be faulted for their overzealous scoring, but this is something we’re not familiar with today. The Bourne Identity’s soundtrack, for instance, is far subtler than its progenitors’, and even modern installments in the Die Hard franchise use music more sparingly.

Stealth!
Stealth!

Yet, in the face of its many foibles—too numerous to list here, but the abovementioned ones caught my attention most—Predator completely turns it around in its final act, providing perhaps the finest twenty minutes of action we’re ever likely to see: the duel between Schwarzenegger and Predator. It is a spectacularly filmed sequence, as Schwarzenegger turns from hunted to hunter and outwits his foe. It is here that the film truly comes into its own. It is now logical and well-paced; it is taut unlike before; the score compliments the action; the camerawork becomes meaningful. Even the one-liners begin to pay off. Schwarzenegger’s “You’re one ugly motherfucker” upon seeing Predator’s face for the first time may very well be one of the greatest lines in all of film.

Predator might have done better had the majority of the film been Schwarzenegger squaring off against his nemesis. A one-on-one contest is much more compelling than watching a group of commandos drop like flies at the hands of an invisible enemy. Dialogue is minimal during this final act; this in fact helps the film, for its strong suit is the action, and exposition about betrayals and backstabbing and choppers and extraction points is only a hindrance. And, in fact, most action movies follow this one-on-one formula today. At the very least, the focus is often on a sole protagonist (rather than a group as in Predator), like the Bourne films, or a movie like Taken. Despite its overwhelming commercial success, we see few echoes of Predator in the action genre today. One expects a wave of knock-offs following a box office sensation—this was certainly how other genres grew in the 70s and 80s, like the disaster genre—but Predator’s ‘team of humans vs. space aliens’ archetype never became mainstream in film. We might chalk up Predator’s impotence to another John McTiernan film released in 1988, just one year after Predator: Die Hard.

Die Hard, also directed by John McTiernan and released just one year after Predator, enjoyed more success than Predator.
Die Hard, also directed by John McTiernan and released just one year after Predator, enjoyed more success than Predator.

Die Hard utterly eclipsed Predator critically and financially, and unlike Predator, Die Hard’s impact on the action genre was positively enormous. It was Die Hard that fully established both the ‘one-man-army’ and ‘buddy-cop’ archetypes that action films so frequently ape today. Fold a piece of letter paper vertically in half, and make a list of Predator knockoffs on one side and a list of Die Hard knockoffs on the other. You’ll run out of space on the Die Hard side before you even make it halfway down the Predator side. Just to illustrate: Air Force One, Speed, Passenger 57, 16 Blocks, Tears of the Sun, Mercury Rising, Hostage, Sudden Death, Con Air, Under Siege, Cliffhanger, Executive Decision. . . the list extends still further.

The success of Die Hard’s formula goes beyond the film’s critical acclaim and good box office numbers. It happens that the Die Hard model is just more appealing to audiences. We like underdogs, and it’s easier to become attached to one man when he’s fighting against a large force of evil. We like to bond with characters, and in Die Hard we’re given just one character to connect to—the protagonist. That works well in a two-hour film, but by comparison, Predator presents the audience with an array of leads, far too many to juggle in one short sitting. (It doesn’t help that Predator’s characters are wafer-thin, throwaways that merely justify the orgy of action onscreen.) But we see what happens once that fat is excised: the time spent alone with Schwarzenegger is Predator’s best. Though it’s a short twenty minutes, we now have a clear hero to focus our energy on, and we are delighted to see him succeed. A four-man hunt against the Predator would not have been nearly as satisfying.

Predator would have preempted Die Hard had it been Schwarzenegger vs. Predator all along. We can only speculate how many more Predator-like films we might have seen had this been the case. Indeed, had Die Hard not released in the first place, we might have seen more imitations of Predator. But, as it happens, Die Hard took over, and its format spread throughout film and even into television. Shows like 24 are really just extensions of the John McClane character. Where Die Hard became prolific—almost viral—Predator became inert. It has influenced plenty of films, but it has not caused a great number to copy it. It’s certainly remembered today, and it is still adored by fans of action films, but it’s not the peak of the genre that people may once have thought it to be.

ErisRonon July 10, 2012 at 11:17 a.m.

hey, great read :)

phoenix87xon July 10, 2012 at 11:21 a.m.

They should make a prequel where they are being hunted down by black goo. Because lame, plot-hole black goo is the best villain of all time and stuff.

But in all seriousness, Predator kicks major ass.

SmarmyJerkfaceon July 10, 2012 at 11:37 a.m.

I strenuously object to the premise of this entire article. Just out of curiousity (and there is no judgment or malice intended by this question mind you), how old are you Matthew and when did you first watch Predator?

Delta_Assaulton July 10, 2012 at 1:35 p.m.
Predator has no foibles. In fact, I prefer it to Die Hard.
sneaky77on July 10, 2012 at 2:30 p.m.

I am not sure why a article about Predator turned into a Die Hard lovefest at the end. I mean yeah, same director.. but what does that have to do with being the 25th anniversary of Predator?

Jaxleyon July 10, 2012 at 5:02 p.m.

I love this film. In fact this year to celebrate the 25 years, a few friends and I made a parody tribute of it on Youtube. It's called Predator: Abridged if you wanna check it out.

MrMazzon July 10, 2012 at 5:31 p.m.

This movie has aged better than original Terminator to me. Man I need to go pick this one up again.

Napalmon July 10, 2012 at 7:33 p.m.

@SmarmyJerkface said:

I strenuously object to the premise of this entire article. Just out of curiousity (and there is no judgment or malice intended by this question mind you), how old are you Matthew and when did you first watch Predator?

I was about to say, this sounds like a, "talk shit about Predator," article.

Also, what action movies eventually became? Dude, Predator is the action movie. Besides, I've always preferred the Asian action counterpart in the eighties/nineties anyway, if you want to go down that path.

-chapel-on July 10, 2012 at 8:11 p.m.

@sneaky77 said:

I am not sure why a article about Predator turned into a Die Hard lovefest at the end. I mean yeah, same director.. but what does that have to do with being the 25th anniversary of Predator?

XD.....God I miss Rorie and Alex.....

zoozillaon July 10, 2012 at 9:54 p.m.

Can we take this time to acknowledge that John McTiernan was a damn fine action filmmaker? Maybe not all of his films were masterpieces, but the guy knew how to film action (without the cop-out shaky-cam style we see so much of today).

JTB123on July 11, 2012 at 1:42 a.m.

I think some of your Die Hard knockoffs are stretching it a bit, and Die Hard is kind of dumb in its own way. I think Bruce Willis and Alan Rickman are really what elevate Die Hard, if you removed those two actors the film wouldn't be nearly as good as it is.

Looking forward to seeing what you film pick next.

simonbuchanon July 11, 2012 at 1:46 a.m.

I recently (a few months ago) saw Predator in theater*, and seriously enjoyed the heck out if it! It certainly helps, though I may be imagining it, that I think it may be (an attempt at?) a deconstruction of the action genre, previous Schwarzenegger films in particular: note that nearly all the "tough guy" acting, including everything that could be seriously considered a one-liner in the classic sense, happens in the early scenes attacking the village, up to when the team finds the skinned bodies.

From then they get progressively more freaked out and less jokey and macho: even the minigun scene where they cut down a section of forest in uninterupted gunfire for probably a full minute is there because Mac goes crazy (with anger or fear?) after Blain gets killed out of nowhere, and it's not alone in that: nearly the entire middle third is split between everyone progressively going mad and getting killed until we enter the darkest hour (nearly perfectly on "get to the choppa", amusingly). Most classical action films would have maybe one or two guys bravely sacrificing themselves to save the others, and such deaths are normally quickly and overwhelmingly revenged: nearly the exact opposite happens here. It even goes out of it's way to undercut the team attempting to fight back or prove their superiority or intelligence: the Predator sees and avoids every one of the many traps they set, and when Mac overcomes his fear to attack the intruder in the camp at night it turns out he's claiming victory after stabbing a wild pig (they even laugh at him).

Not to say the film is perfect or anything! The pacing is often bizarrely slow, the first 20 or so minutes especially; if this was intended to be a deconstruction the team's freaking out was too cliche to really sell it (Billy was probably the worst here: cutting your chest open with a Bowie knife is pretty stupid in just about any situation); and the "acting" is hardly worthy of the name.

Am I just crazy putting this much interpretation into the Ur-Guns-and-Explosions film?

* Hoyts, the major theater chain in New Zealand, has been showing one-off showings of older films, just on blu-rays though. I hear the US is doing that too?

PS: what's up with the footer still having the old sites?

cikameon July 11, 2012 at 12:24 p.m.
You just called Con Air a Die Hard knock off, i now don't take anything you write seriously.
Martin_Blankon July 11, 2012 at 7:12 p.m.

@simonbuchan said:

Am I just crazy putting this much interpretation into the Ur-Guns-and-Explosions film?

I don't know, perhaps you listened to John McTiernan's director's commentary.

Funky_Pasta_Tommyon July 12, 2012 at 2:59 a.m.

Love me some predator!

simonbuchanon July 12, 2012 at 5:10 a.m.

@Martin_Blank: Oh? I may have to do that some time.

GBrutalityon July 12, 2012 at 1:49 p.m.

It's really not fair to compare Predator to Die Hard. In one film, the bad guy was a German madman (since you want to talk about cliches, you don't get many as clear as that) with a team of killers and thieves. In the other, the antagonist is a goddamn alien monster that is on the hunt. They both have action elements and fall into the category of action which is true, but 28 Days Later and Shaun of the Dead have zombies and can be categorized as horror but clearly they both shouldn't be compared.

You mentioned the cliche thing early in your article and I want to point out that we all know cliches from these movies. This was the era of the cliche characters when they were being conceived just as characters. This wasn't supposed to be a great film, hell, they probably didn't think people would be thinking about it 25 years later. I mean, did you see what the predator was originally supposed to look like? It was ridiculous. Die Hard was great because that's what they wanted. Predator, I think, surprised everyone involved. If they wanted someone that could pass off as an actor, they would've gotten a Bruce Willis type (who at the time was more known for comedy anyway) like Die Hard did. But they wanted an adrenaline-fueled, sci-fi action flick with a rag-tag group of people you don't want to mess with and future governors.

I guess what I'm trying to say is, yes, we know Die Hard was great. It's hard to find someone to contend that fact (how you brought that into the talk of 25 years of predator is a little off-point but okay). But what made Predator great was all the reasons you kind of started to bash up there.

theberserkeron July 14, 2012 at 7:34 a.m.

Lets just say........................ you're wrong.

roger778on July 17, 2012 at 2:03 p.m.

What an awesome movie. A very good mix of suspenseful horror and action.

Dig Deeper into Predator

Dutch and his team of special forces are sent in to rescue a Presidential Cabinet Minister from a group of guerrillas. During their mission, they find the skinned bodies of two CIA Agents. But soon, they discover they're not alone... and are, in fact, being hunted themselves.

Edit/View the Wiki
Hit the Forums (3 Posts)
Add/View Images (61 Images)
Watch Some Videos
After Ted Sarandos, Will Hollywood ever be the same?

An interview with the man behind the content of Netflix reveals an interesting and passionate executive.

Community Showcase for May 20th

Batman is here this week to present to you your Community Showcase.

About Last Night: Game of Thrones: "Second Sons"

Marriage marriage is what brings us together today.

Xbox One Hopes to Change Your Entertainment Habits

Will the next set of consoles change the way we consume our media?

Disney/Lucasfilm Announce New Animated Star Wars Show

There won't be anymore clones but Disney wants to stay in the animated Star Wars arena.

Let’s Talk About Mad Men: “The Crash”

This episode had everything: comedy, drugs, mayhem, flashbacks, emotion—what more do you need?

This Wolverine Trailer Finally Feels Complete

A new Wolverine trailer reveals a more soulful and desperate Wolverine, which could be a good thing.

What To Watch for Tuesday May 21st

Not much on a Tuesday night but there is a season finale.

DVD/Blu-Ray Releases for May 21st

There may be a lot of Blu-Rays released but only a few you should really care about.

Badass Digest: 8 of the Best Fantasy Films

Devin is totally not drunk on mead as he runs down some of his favorite fantasy films.

The Top 10 Vietnam War Movies

The Best List is here to run down the best films to capture the essence of the Vietnam war.

Disney/Lucasfilm Announce New Animated Star Wars Show

There won't be anymore clones but Disney wants to stay in the animated Star Wars arena.

Anchorman 2 Teaser

It isn't much but it is our first look at the returning characters of Anchorman 2.

What To Watch for Wednesday, May 22nd

Wednesday brings the thunder!

After Ted Sarandos, Will Hollywood ever be the same?

An interview with the man behind the content of Netflix reveals an interesting and passionate executive.

Netflix Instant Update for May 23rd

There may not be a whole lot coming to Netflix, but there are some decent titles worth checking out.

Recent Reviews
Mandatory Network

Submissions can take several hours to be approved.

Save ChangesCancel