
Plans are advancing for the fourth movie in that harder-edge spy franchise Matt Damon once headlined. Deadline’s reported that Tony Gilroy’s moving ahead to write and direct this flick--which will see a new super-secret-agent stepping forth into Treadstone's clandestine playground-- and he’s reportedly considering basically every young, male actor for the part.
In alphabetical order, the potentials are…
- Paul Dano
- Joel Edgerton
- Luke Evans
- Michael Fassbender
- Jake Gyllenhaal
- Josh Hartnett
- Garrett Hedlund
- Oscar Isaac
- Taylor Kitsch
- Tobey Maguire
- Alex Pettyfer
- Michael Pitt
- Benjamin Walker
I’m honestly not too invested in the Bourne series (though I did enjoy Supremacy a great deal) and am a little dubious about how strong a milieu the series’ “world” is to support a movie without its main character. However, if they casted Paul Dano out of all these dudes, I’d definitely be intrigued to watch, because that’d be one hell of a jump in roles.
This is going to be loosely based off the Bourne Legacy, the first Bourne novel written after Robert Ludlum's death. While it might adhere too close to the book’s plot, it sounds like it’ll realize the title more literally than previous installments did (since, you know, the movie would be about Bourne’s successor and not Bourne himself.) Bourne Identity’s title fit the plot pretty directly (and in a somewhat pun-y way, to boot) but the sequels’ titles seemed to correlate more obliquely (did Bourne reign supreme over his foes in #2? Did he ever actually deliver an ultimatum to anybody in #3?)




























Really though, it's still odd making a Bourne film without Damon.
id also be interested to see channing tatum come on board.
Out of those I'd love to see Maguire or Fassbender.
Then again if I actually had any say in the matter I'd just shitcan a 4th Bourne film.