Scott Pilgrim Vs. The World

Topic started by Rorie on Aug. 12, 2010. Last post by HandsomeDead 9 months, 3 weeks ago.
Post by Rorie (3,214 posts) See mini bio
Staff
It can't be easy, adapting source material to make a movie. On the one hand, you have the fans of the source, no doubt eager to mine your film for the smallest variation from their beloved tome and subsequently rip you to shreds, and on the other, people who have no clue what the movie they've just paid 15 bucks to watch is based on, and don't really care: they just want to be entertained. So it's kind of a minor miracle that Scott Pilgrim Vs. The World manages to take the six graphic novels it's based on and, well, hyper-adapts them, while still remaining quite faithful. Much of the dialogue and action is lifted directly from the books, but translated in a way that makes you think that this material should've always been a film, somehow. But while the strengths of the comics are heightened in the film, their weaknesses are also exaggerated. It's these weaknesses that will ultimately determine your reaction to this film, but as a pure piece of hyperactive pop culture-ness, there's a lot to like here.


If you've been living on the moon and somehow have escaped the barrage of marketing materials for this movie, a quick recap: the eponymous Scott Pilgrim ( Michael Cera) sees Ramona Flowers ( Mary Elizabeth Winstead) in his dreams, and subsequently at a party, and immediately falls for her. Hard. To the point where, learning that she delivers packages for Amazon (I wasn't aware that Amazon had their own delivery people?), arranges a meet-cute by ordering a package and simply waiting for it to arrive. Soon enough, it's revealed that she has seven evil exes, all of whom he must defeat in battle before he can earn the right to date her permanently.

And thus begins a series of what are, effectively, boss fights. The director, Edgar Wright, has said that he intended each of these fights to reflect escalating conflicts over the course of a video game, and thus we start with the easily-dispatched Matthew Patel ( Satya Bhabha), who fights Scott in a grungy rock club, and work our way up to Gideon Gordon Graves ( Jason Schwartzman), the commandant and founder of the League of Evil Exes. The fights get progressively slicker as we go along, as well as progressively over-the-top; the style here is a gigantic melange of video game tropes (defeated exes melt into a spray of coins) and 60's Batman-style visual onomatopoeia, where someone getting hit will have a gigantic "SMAK" appear over his head, and so on. 
 
It's a bit dizzying at times, but Wright's touch is so adept that you can't help but enjoy yourself; it helps that there's some genuine affection for the references that he throws out. In lesser hands, this all could've come across as a big-budget attempt to appeal to fans of 4chan memes (the tagline "an epic of epic epicness" still makes me a bit nauseous), and there's still a bit too much of the "wink wink, nudge nudge, aren't we all special for communally recognizing this cool reference" feel to it, but, if nothing else, Wright deserves credit for not holding anything back. There are some great touches, like the battle of the bands that evolves into a battle between two giant, animated avatars, and the revelation that veganism is the source of all of Brandon Routh's powers. 

But although the film is as visually arresting as anything you're likely to see in theaters this year, it's a shame that more effort wasn't put into making the characters a bit more likable; they really do come across as simplistic as your stereotypical comic book character. Scott, for instance, madly falls in love with Ramona despite having never talked to her before, to the point where he neglects to even break up with his current girlfriend before pursuing her; an act of douchiness that makes him somewhat difficult to like, and that's not even mentioning his overall resemblance to a five-year-old in his mannerisms. 
 
Ramona, for her part, barely seems worth pursuing as a love interest; she's a mostly sour individual who rarely smiles--it's as if Scott has taken a fancy to the world's youngest truck-stop diner waitress, someone who seems to never get past regarding him as a new toy. A bit more time fleshing out these characters would've been welcome, but instead, we're left bouncing around among the dizzying cast of characters, whose number includes not only the seven evil exes, but Scott's roommate, his two band-mates, their roadie, his sister, his current girlfriend, his ex-girlfriend, his barista (!), and assorted hangers-on. It's kind of an overstuffed movie, and you get the sense that more judicious cuts to the source material would've been welcome if the extra time had been used to shed more light on the relationship that's supposed to be at the center of the film.

Given the characterization issues, it's worth noting that the large ensemble cast does a generally good job of bringing their characters to life, given that many of them have mere minutes of screen time. I'm not Michael Cera's biggest fan, but given that the Scott Pilgrim character already exhibits a good number of the various Cera-isms that drive me up the wall in other movies of his, he's less annoying here than he has been in a while, which is a good thing, since he's in almost every scene. Winstead is as stolid as you'd expect Ramona Flowers to be, although that's more of a problem with the character than her performance. The rest of the cast is generally good; even the normally creepy Kieran Culkin manages to be winning as Scott's put-upon gay roommate.

Honestly, it strikes me as kind of futile to try and write anything about Scott Pilgrim Vs. The World; this is a film that lives in the visual realm to a point that it almost defies textual description, in much the same manner as some of Tony Scott's more frenetically edited films. As a 30-year-old, I can confidently say that I'm in the gray, age-gated, demilitarized zone that separates those who will find this film endlessly entertaining and those who will find it similar to the sensation of sitting in an airplane seat that's being kicked by a toddler for two hours. Honestly, I find it kind of both: it has a charming, hyperkinetic sensibility to it, and instantly launches itself into the discussion of "best video game movie ever made" (despite not being based on a video game), but at the same time, the character interactions are as shallow as you'd probably find in the most perfunctory of videogame plots. These characterization issues don't quite overshadow the accomplishments of Edgar Wright, however, and even if Scott Pilgrim brings to mind that phrase "full of sound and fury, signifying nothing", it can safely be said that you've never seen sound and fury quite as unique as what's on display here.
Post by Gabriel (224 posts) See mini bio
Suprised it scored so high, though I still think it looks dumb.
Post by Joe (1,514 posts) See mini bio
Okay, I think I'll give this a shot. I'm not as into it as a lot of people online seem to be, but it's getting decent reviews.
Post by MetalGearSunny (643 posts) See mini bio
I wanna see it!!
Post by Rorie (3,214 posts) See mini bio
Staff
@Gabriel:  If there was a 3.5, this movie would've earned it. It's still pretty unique and inventive, but yeah, it's kind of dumb in a few ways. Still, enjoyably dumb.
Post by GhostNPC (317 posts) See mini bio
Wow, that's a much better score than I expected it to be. I might actually go see this.
Post by mrcritic (7 posts) See mini bio
I'll wait for it on Netflix. 
Post by Brendan (190 posts) See mini bio

The score was a 4, yet the review read like a 3.  Hm.   It doesn't look terrible, I'll rent it.
Post by Nexas (29 posts) See mini bio
Huh, didn't Alex say he was going to review this?
Post by Jeffmoocow (156 posts) See mini bio
I cannot wait to see this movie already.
Post by Dauragon (139 posts) See mini bio
@Rorie: I am really glad that you liked it.  I was kind of worried there for a second. I'm a insane rabid Scott Pilgrim fan so of course this is probably my favorite movie of the year (tied with Inception), so I'm glad to see that someone who isn't as obsessed enjoy it. That was my biggest concern after i left the preview screening I was at, which was basically only other crazed Scott Pilgrim fans. I also agree that this is basically the greatest videogame movie of all time, and probably will be for a very very long time.
 
Also: What did you think of that fuckin universal logo in the beginning? I feel like might be the best of the "crazy" studo intros in a while.
Post by Milkman (645 posts) See mini bio
@Nexas said:
" Huh, didn't Alex say he was going to review this? "
They probably figured there is no point in Alex going to see it since Rorie already saw it at Comic-Con.
Post by onlineatron (243 posts) See mini bio
There seems to be a massive disconnect between text and score in this review. 
  
Probably down to the limitations of a 6-point scale, but it almost seems as though the score was rounded up due to love of Edgar Wright. 
 
In which case I place no blame on Matt. I idolise Edgar Wright ,and have been smitten by all his previous work, so a nudge into to higher score regions is acceptable. 
 
Of course the contrast could also be explained away via the sentence Honestly, it strikes me as kind of futile to try and write anything about Scott Pilgrim Vs. The World; '. Perhaps the real '4-star' aspect of the movie lies in it's presentation?
Post by TheFreeMan (894 posts) See mini bio
Yes, very happy to hear that Rorie enjoyed this! I'm getting more and more excited to see this movie, especially since I'm a giant fan of the comics.
Post by cooljammer00 (326 posts) See mini bio
Yeah, I thought the plan was to have Alex review it (he seemed to have "dibs" on it, or something).  Rorie seeing it at Comic Con was just an unforeseen bonus.
Post by cooljammer00 (326 posts) See mini bio
@Gabriel said:
" Suprised it scored so high, though I still think it looks dumb. "
Isn't the whole point of reviews to hear a little more about a movie and judge it based on that, rather than "It looks dumb"?
Post by masternater27 (33 posts) See mini bio
I got free tickets to a premiere awhile back and I'll post what I've told all of my friends.  If you were big into gaming at some point in your life you'll probably like it a lot.  If not, it'll probably look like a 7 year old with ADD made this and you'll wonder why everybody is laughing.
Post by gelatinabomination (485 posts) See mini bio
I don't understand why I don't want to see this movie. It should appeal to the hyperactive video game nerd that I am, but the main character's douchiness seems to be more off-putting to me than I expected.
Post by Rmack (39 posts) See mini bio
" But although the film is as visually arresting as anything you're likely to see in theaters this year, it's a shame that more effort wasn't put into making the characters a bit more likable; they really do come across as simplistic as your stereotypical comic book character. Scott, for instance, madly falls in love with Ramona despite having never talked to her before, to the point where he neglects to even break up with his current girlfriend before pursuing her; an act of douchiness that makes him somewhat difficult to like, and that's not even mentioning his overall resemblance to a five-year-old in his mannerisms. 
 
I just want to say this is exactly why I hated the comic.
Post by Rorie (3,214 posts) See mini bio
Staff
@Brendan:  It was in-betweener, but in the end, this is an amazingly unique movie, speaking mostly of its visuals. It reminded me a bit of Tony Scott's Domino in that I didn't care much for the story, but the way the boundaries of filmmaking are pushed is really intriguing. I kept thinking that we were getting some glimpse of the future of filmmaking while I was watching it. Don't get me wrong: if every movie looks like this in five years, I'll probably go insane. But for now, it's enough of an outlier from what you might expect from your average movie-going experience that it's worth checking out.
Scott Pilgrim vs. the World International Trailer

Now with more boob punching and Canadian hipster love!

Scott Pilgrim vs. Lucas Lee Fight Scene

Scott faces down Ramona's evil-ex Lucas Lee and his retinue of stunt doubles.

Scott Pilgrim vs. the World Trailer #2

Ever wanted to watch Michael Cera get his ass kicked in increasingly effects-heavy ways? Then brother, does this new Scott Pilgrim trailer ever satisfy.

Screened's Summer Movie Preview

Alex and Rorie check out the 2010 Summer Movie Lineup.

Scott Pilgrim vs. the World Trailer

Defeat seven evil ex-boyfriends? That's easy. Once my girlfriend made me defeat twenty-five evil kittens. At least, I'm pretty sure they were evil.

review review (4 out of 5) ricardoga
blog Survival of the Fittest: The Tricky Art of Adaptation TheFantasticFillip
blog Bonus Picture: 2011 Scream Awards Predictions Part 1 jackanderson
blog 2011 Teen Choice Awards Predictions: Movies Part 2 jackanderson
review The perfect visual spectacle for the hipster in all of us (4 out of 5) Delta_Assault
news Four Deep Cuts Open Up from Scott Pilgrim's Fictitious Band, Sex Bob-omb Tom_Pinchuk
news 2010: The Year in Box Office Bombs Alex
news 2010: The Year in Movie Quotes Alex
349 votes, 4.2 avg.

  • 7.8

  • 3.8

  • B+

  • 81
General Information Edit
Name Scott Pilgrim vs. the World
US Release Aug. 13, 2010
UK Release Aug. 13, 2010
AUS Release
Runtime 113
Language(s)
Add a new language
Genre(s)
Add a new genre
Theme(s)
Add a new theme
Rating PG-13
Alias(es)
Top Rated Lists
Screened Community Best of 2010 a list of 25 items by Badfilms
Movies watched 2011 a list of 116 items by Christina
  • In today's dollars
    Domestic $31,524,275
    Foreign +16,140,284
  • = total worldwide gross $47,664,559
  • - a reported budget of $60,000,000
  • = a -20.6% net profit of $-12,335,441
Top Editors

Submissions can take several hours to be approved.

Save ChangesCancel