Star Trek: Enterprise Forum

The second season of a television show is often the most interesting. Inter-character relationships become more complex and nuanced, plotlines that work are emphasized while those that don’t fall to the wayside, characters that aren’t connecting with the audience can be re-written or replaced. You’ll occasionally find a show that fires on all cylinders from the get-go, but it’s generally the second that winds up really sucking you in - witness the widening mysteries of the second season of Lost, for instance, or the melodrama of season two of Buffy The Vampire Slayer.

That’s...not really the case for season two of Enterprise, for better or for worse. I haven’t continued past season two yet, but even I know that the series was retooled for season three; the series was renamed from Enterprise to Star Trek: Enterprise, for one thing, and it had a new intro sequence and a new adversary to confront in a new sector of space. After finishing off season two, I’ll honestly say I’m looking forward to the reboot: while the season is generally solid, it still feels a bit too solid for my tastes. The plotlines from season one were moved forward only incrementally, and such relationships as there are seem to be in something of a standstill as well. Read on for a more detailed breakdown of the season!

The early episodes of the season feel as if the creators were trying to mark off fan-service entries on a checklist: Introduce the Romulans? Check. Klingons? Check. Borg? Check. Get Hoshi topless? Check. None of these things are particularly bad, per se, but I’d be lying if they didn’t seem to be a bit reactionary, as if the new species and enemies introduced in season one simply weren’t enough to hold a traditional Star Trek audience’s attention. The Suliban, for instance, appear in the first episode, pop in about halfway through the season, and then appear in an abbreviated form in the season finale (about which more later). It’s tough to take them seriously as series-spanning antagonists when they simply disappear off into the ether for months at a time and leave the Enterprise to travel around unhindered.

The level of fear that the showrunners display at any kind of serialized drama is kind of telling. Deep Space Nine, still my favorite of the Star Trek series, was densely serialized, especially in its last few seasons, which is arguably why I liked it so much. Enterprise seems to have been destined for five-nights-a-week syndication from its inception, however; you could shuffle the order of most of the episodes (excepting the season premiere and finale) without impacting your ability to follow along. Which isn’t a bad thing, necessarily, but given the option to enjoy serialized narratives or the episode-of-the-week format, I’ll go with the former every time.

Which isn’t to say that there aren’t some nods to continuity, as when the Romulan minefield busts their ship up and it needs significant repairs the next episode, or the recurring (well, over three episodes) Klingon threat due to Archer’s escape from Rura Penthe. Perhaps the most laugh-worthy callback, however, has to be T’Pol and her Vulcan AIDS. I mean, what else can you call Pa’nar Syndrome? A small segment of the Vulcan population performs acts that the majority doesn’t approve of, forcing them to live in secrecy, and they’re the only ones who can contract this disease? And the majority chooses not to spend research money on the topic, seeing that it’s only contracted by undesirables? A bit of a heavy-handed analogy, that. I mean, I get it: Star Trek has always used its sci-fi setting to examine modern-day concerns, like racism, US-Soviet relations, and whale hunting, but Pa'nar syndrome seems like a rather weak echo of the kinds of things that And The Band Played On... was saying 10 years previously. 

The bizarre recycling of TNG episodes continues apace, as well. The ones I recognized included: “P recious Cargo”, which features the “female passenger falling in love with the wrong man” motif from the TNG episode “ The Perfect Mate”; “ The Communicator” uses the same “genetically-altered but captured behind enemy lines” theme as the TNG episode “ First Contact”; “ Singularity”, with T’Pol saving the ship while the rest of the crew was incapacitated, seemed awfully similar to Troi saving the enterprise in “ Night Terrors”; and Hoshi’s incorporeal adventures in “ Vanishing Point” were an obvious throwback to Ensign Ro and La Forge’s troubles in “ The Next Phase”. “Vanishing Point” was especially interesting due to the fact that everything that Hoshi went through was explained away as being nothing more than a hallucination. The “It was all a dream!” conclusion to a television show was a hoary chestnut well before Enterprise even took the air; seeing them dust it off for apparently no good reason other than that it was convenient was fairly disconcerting.

Lastly, the abrupt about-face by the Suliban in the last episode was immensely confusing. These guys are supposed to be the Big Bad of the Enterprise timeline, possessed of mysterious powers and a pretty rad home base, but then, all of a sudden, hey! We’re your friends now! Here’s some information that’ll help you track down the other bad guys that toasted your homeworld. It’s been a fun rivalry; we’ll see you on the flipside! I can only presume that the Suliban were one of those plotlines that wasn’t connecting with the audience, and I can see that: time-travel villains and plotlines are always hard to justify logically, so hopefully the introduction of the Xindi is an attempt to simply reset all of the Temporal Cold War ludicrousness and getting us back into some good, old-fashioned space battles. I kind of dig the idea of the The Expanse, too, although these kinds of strange segments of the galaxy do tend to pop up as soon as they’re narratively convenient (no one ever explained how the Enterprise got through The Great Barrier in Star Trek V, did they?). 
 
All of this unfortunately sounds like a pile of complaints, but don't take that too seriously: despite the problems the show has, it's still Star Trek, and as such is pretty watchable, even if I do tend to whine about the stuff I don't like. It's no TNG or DS9, of course, but I much prefer it to Voyager, largely on the strength of the cast: the actors are a bit bland overall, sure, but I genuinely like Connor Trinneer's turn as the ship's engineer, John Billingsley is refreshingly laid-back as Phlox, and, well, as far as eye candy goes, I'd put Jolene Blalock's T'Pol up there with anyone else in the Star Trek family of shows. (Although the twice-yearly opportunities to get her topless strike me as a bit tasteless.) There were also some genuinely good episodes in the season: " Dawn" was an obvious play on Enemy Mine, but it was still effective as a piece of drama. 
 
So, we boldly go into season three. I'm looking forward to it, honestly; I give the showrunners credit for knowing when to fold an unappealing storyline and move onto new adventures. It obviously wasn't enough to save the show from its ultimate cancellation, but I'm still hoping that it gives the series a bit of forward momentum that it has thus far lacked a bit. We'll find out together, as we boldly go...well, where everyone's gone before me. But I'm catching up!  
  

Never did get into Star Trek, but i did like First contac t.

I feel like when they retooled the series Enterprise became pretty awesome. I know I'm pretty alone in that, though. I loved seasons 3 and 4. 3 for finally taking Star Trek into full on serial and 4 for just going for the madness of that universe full tilt. 

Jolene Blalock has the most horrible laugh :|
season 3 is good though

it's been a long road getting from here to there

can we get confirmation on the length of the road

When shows relay on a monster of the week format, character development never seems natural. The overarching plots that "tie" the seasons together seem forced as does the character growth. It's hard to have someone grow when we get just a snippet of their life. Serialized shows seem to focus on a lengthened period of time, which makes a character's development seem gradual, and in turn, more natural. The disconnected episodes are one of the reasons Enterprise and many dramas in this format never click with me. 

Now as a person who has never watched Enterprise more than once, how alike are the Suliban and the Taliban, really?

That outtake video made me remember and realize how the black pilot guy was easily the worst and least used character in the whole show, him and Hoshi.

You're seriously crazy if you think Voyager is worse than this nonsense and even crazier if you think DS9 has more good than bad.  As bland as the acting could get and as cheesy as some of the plots were Voyager had a far more consistent sense of peril that easily gives it a far more darker tone than most of the post original series stuff.  As watchable as you make this show sound I don't think sitting through a prequel series will make me like Star Trek any more than I do now.  Always a pleasure to read quality writing though.  Do more TV write-ups!

CUZ I GOT FAITH

@Lingxor said:

" CUZ I GOT FAITH "

OF THE HEARRRRT!
 
Ugh, im getting fatigued from doing that.

@Tartarus: 
I tried to like Hoshi, I really did. I tend to like Asian women whether they deserve it or not. But she was just a terrible character.

@Mezmero:  We'll try! I'll do DS9 next just to spite you.

@Rorie: I think the older seasons of Futurama would be a good review at some point. I mean, I know the show's going again, but it did still get cancelled. Twice, I think?

I'm one of the few people who seemed to really enjoy Enterprise from start to finish without too many missteps.

I think the T'Pol eyecandy played a strong role in keeping my attention through the seasons. 
 
I also liked the atmosphere the first season had with regards to discovery and doing things for the first time. Beyond "firsts", I got the feeling that they also tried to limit the amount of techno-babble that clutters up Star Trek from time to time. Star Trek's best episodes were about the drama of the situation, not the technology driving it. The tech should just serve as the vehicle to observe men and women in either a new situation or an analogous one.

@cooljammer00 said:

"Now as a person who has never watched Enterprise more than once, how alike are the Suliban and the Taliban, really? "

I never thought about that honestly but i suppose you could draw some similarities between the two.  Could possibly be where the writters got the name 'Suliban', they just changed the first two letters. 

I'm pretty curious to hear how season three goes. I was doing some catch up of my own but I gave up a few episodes in to season three. These articles make me want to go back and give it another chance though.

It was sad to see this series not being give a fair chance. I had my issues with it like many, but from season 3 and on it became a good show and could have been even greater.