Someone explain to me what the appeal is (Spoilers)

Topic started by Vinny_Says on June 25, 2011. Last post by FinalArrow 1 year, 10 months ago.
Post by Vinny_Says (11 posts) See mini bio
I'm seriously wondering, I went in with no knowledge of what this was about. My friend told me it was "ET for a new generation", that's it. I've never seen Cloverfield or watched Lost, or even saw E.T.
The first 6 hours are about a train and some cubes, and then it ends in the most abrupt way ever. The kids played their roles great I will admit, and the emotional moments and the loss of his mother were well done. But that can't be why all the reviewers are fawning over this. Right?
Post by BjornTheUnicorn (204 posts) See mini bio

Mainly nostalgia for the Amblin films from the 80s (E.T., The Goonies, etc.) and the fact that it's an overall well-made film. It didn't really end abruptly, more open-ended. It made sense and answered all the questions that needed to be answered.

Post by mike20 (721 posts) See mini bio
I haven't seen it. The trailer gives me a wait until Netflix vibe.
Post by ryanwho (1,130 posts) See mini bio
"The first 6 hours..." 
The film harkens back to a time when films were more personal and methodical, young people have ADHD and need something to be happening every 5 minutes. Even so, I thought it hit a good median between early Spielberg nostalgia and mindless CGI eyefucking. But apparently it didn't appease the latter. I found the ending to be unsat as well, only because Im expected to sympathize with the alien that just finished killing half the city and kidnapping the other half to eat. Which just doesn't gel with me. Random scientists probed the monster, okay, now random people in the midwest deserve to die? Movie logic is silly sometimes. And in JJ fashion, there are holes everywhere. If this monster can consume anything and turn it into a new object, how was it contained? Why didn't it immediately build a ship out of the destroyed train? etc. But similar scrutiny can be lodged at ET and Close Encounters so that's fine.
Post by FinalDasa (2,773 posts) See mini bio
Staff

It was an entertaining sci-fi movie with some good acting from kids, so I liked it. Not everyone's cup of tea.

Post by VioletEyedDragon (1,812 posts) See mini bio
this movie was a severe disappointment
Post by Vinny_Says (11 posts) See mini bio
@ryanwho: I like movies where even though the early bits may seem long, the narrative is actually going somewhere and you can feel the tension building. This had none of that and that's why it felt so drawn out. 
John Carpenter's The Thing is my gold standard for alien movies, and the first half of that movie is amazing even though nothing happens.
Post by Mistress_Redhead (2,848 posts) See mini bio
It definitely was ET for a new generation, but it also had a blend of Goonies that made me love it that little bit more.. I enjoyed how it was about a group of "film maker" kids who obsessed over horror etc.. what pissed me off was the "attempt" at making it a film set in the 60s-70s they really needed to research a bit more...
Post by Vinny_Says (11 posts) See mini bio
@Mistress_Redhead said:
It definitely was ET for a new generation, but it also had a blend of Goonies that made me love it that little bit more.. I enjoyed how it was about a group of "film maker" kids who obsessed over horror etc.. what pissed me off was the "attempt" at making it a film set in the 60s-70s they really needed to research a bit more...
what? It was a dumb zombie movie, what research did they not do? Or are you talking about JJ Abrams? I wasn't around in 1979 but it seemed fine overall, maybe some of the cars were wrong?
Post by Mistress_Redhead (2,848 posts) See mini bio
@blacklabeldomm said:
@Mistress_Redhead said:
It definitely was ET for a new generation, but it also had a blend of Goonies that made me love it that little bit more.. I enjoyed how it was about a group of "film maker" kids who obsessed over horror etc.. what pissed me off was the "attempt" at making it a film set in the 60s-70s they really needed to research a bit more...
what? It was a dumb zombie movie, what research did they not do? Or are you talking about JJ Abrams? I wasn't around in 1979 but it seemed fine overall, maybe some of the cars were wrong?
You mean the kids movie? or the actual film?....
Post by FinalArrow (118 posts) See mini bio
I like to think of this as the Goonies for a new generation who would see the Goonies as a movie with weak sets and poor production!! (I know but to the kids Goonies could look like this, Blasphemy). It will never replace films like ET or other movies in the same voice from our childhood. But then again we are no longer children and have are found memories of seeing these movies at the cinema! This for the this generation to have that same feeling we had after watching such great and fun movies!!! So watch it if you wan't to catch a little part of that old magic!!
Super 8 Theatrical Trailer

We hate to be those guys who get super duper giddy over a movie trailer, but as children of the Spielberg era, we've little choice in the matter. This just looks awesome.

Super 8 Trailer

J.J. Abrams' new monster movie trailer teases us something fierce without showing any leg.

review Not so impressive (2 out of 5) kartron
news Netflix Instant Update: New and Expiring Movies staceywi
review Fun Spielberg Homage (4 out of 5) etragedy
review super 8 (5 out of 5) TheLawnWrangler
news Speaking for Space Whales: Characters Translating for Other Forms of Intelligence AndyGray
news Rorie's Top Ten (And Bottom Three) Movies Of 2011 Rorie
blog My Top 10 of 2011 spilledmilkfactory
news The 10 Best Action Scenes Of 2011 Rorie
139 votes, 4.0 avg.
General Information Edit
Name Super 8
US Release June 10, 2011
UK Release Aug. 5, 2011
AUS Release
Runtime 112
Language(s)
Add a new language
Genre(s)
Add a new genre
Theme(s)
Add a new theme
Rating PG-13
Alias(es)
Top Rated Lists
Favourite Films a list of 99 items by Icon
Alternate Poster Art a list of 25 items by ashogo
Movies watched 2011 a list of 116 items by Christina
  • In today's dollars
    Domestic $127,004,179
    Foreign +132,932,498
  • = total worldwide gross $259,936,677
  • - a reported budget of $50,000,000
  • = a 419.9% net profit of $209,936,677
Top Editors
Mandatory Network

Submissions can take several hours to be approved.

Save ChangesCancel