The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo

Topic started by Alex on Dec. 19, 2011. Last post by K9 1 year, 3 months ago.
Post by Alex (325 posts) See mini bio
Moderator

Stieg Larsson's lurid crime novel The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo has now been adapted for film twice; once as a straightforward, somewhat sterile Swedish-language film starring Noomi Rapace and Michael Nyqvist, and now for the English speakers courtesy of David Fincher. Fincher's version adds a great deal of stylistic dread to the proceedings, coating the camera in a layer of ice before making his actors (Rooney Mara and Daniel Craig) melt it off the screen with a mixture of fiery rage and grotesque violence. Where the first Dragon Tattoo film sometimes felt stilted, unsure of itself, and unwilling to delve into the truly seedy atmosphere of Larsson's book, Fincher dives in headfirst with aplomb.

And yet, there is something missing from Fincher's version that makes it somehow less memorable. It's certainly not the leads, who are as good or better than their Swedish counterparts. It's not the cinematography by Fincher mainstay Jeff Cronenweth, which is as moody and haunting as anything in Fincher's catalog--yes, even the much-vaunted crime classics Seven and Zodiac. And it's not the soundtrack by Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross, which, more so even than their work on The Social Network, blends effortlessly into the fabric of the story, underlining the uneasiness of every desperate, visible breath expelled on screen.

So what is it then? I personally point to the script by Steven Zaillian, which is a bit of a mess. Any screenwriter attempting to adapt Larsson's Millennium trilogy is unquestionably in for a bit of a task, as the books are, to put it politely, dense. It's something that the Swedish film wrestled with as well, attempting to turn in a watchable movie while maintaining the key character moments spread throughout. In this regard, the Swedish film's sometimes clinical-seeming approach works far more to the story's benefit. Only small chunks of that film felt rushed through. Despite being a bit longer than its predecessor, Fincher's Dragon Tattoo runs at a breakneck pace that never, ever lets up.

And even with that breakneck pace, some of the story flaws inherent to the source material stick out all the more. We meet disgraced Swedish journalist Mikael Blomkvist (Craig) in the middle of his own disgrace. We understand that he has published a story about a billionaire industrialist, and was successfully sued by said industrialist for libel. Now apparently ruined, Blomkvist seems an attractive target for an aristocratic family looking for an investigator to do some digging on a murder that has haunted the family's de facto leader (Christopher Plummer) for decades.

We learn prior to Blomkvist's acceptance of the job that he was investigated himself by a freelance security consultant and computer hacking enthusiast named Lisbeth Salander (Mara). Pierced, dyed, bleached, strapped, zippered, and whatever else you might conjure when imagining the accouterments of gothy rebellion, Salander is a ghostly waif of a woman, a ward of the state reduced to a kind of feral existence, scrounging for money, information on her various clients, and perhaps something that might even resemble a connection with another human being.

In this regard, Mara's Salander is perhaps a bit more identifiable as human than Rapace's was. Rapace was hellfire and brimstone, a buzzsaw of determination and seething anger. Mara embodies much of that rage and hatred--especially during the particularly cringe-inducing scenes with her sweaty, skeevy rapist social worker--but also exudes a kind of detached vulnerability; almost like an awareness of her own emotions, but an inability (or unwillingness) to access them.

Mara embodies the fierceness of the character wonderfully, and she's aided by a strong performance from Craig, who similarly feels more human, and less a vacant construct than Nyqvist did in his role. They're especially good in their scenes together, researching and investigating the horrible, murderous, backstabbing, Nazi-fueled past of this bizarre family. It's just a shame it takes over an hour to even get the two to meet on screen, and even longer for them to really get into the meat of the mystery. Much of the first hour of the film is spent setting up Salander's troubled existence (not to mention provide her an opportunity to get some extremely satisfying revenge on her rapist), while Craig wanders around in the snow looking for clues, and mostly getting nowhere.

Anyone who has read the book knows that this is symptomatic of Larsson's fiction. Fincher and Zaillian are just following the material they've been provided. Unfortunately, Zaillian never quite figures out the right balance between what to keep and what to cut. Whole sequences that feel like they ought to be lingered on a bit more are simply dashed through, especially toward the end, where everything is tied up so neatly and pristinely not just once, but twice, that you start to wonder why all that dread was inflicted on you in the first place.

Fincher, after all, is known for finding ways to get under the audience's skin. With Seven, it was the grisly, despicable nature of the crimes contained in the screenplay, and the deft, utterly mesmerizing execution of its twisty conclusion. In Zodiac, it was the obsession, the all-consuming desire to solve this utterly baffling crime, and the dangers surrounding that obsession that made the audience consistently uneasy.

The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo never quite finds a way to dig underneath the surface as those films did. No matter how twisted the elements of the family's past turn out, no matter how truly disturbing the motives of those involved are revealed to be, nothing quite sticks. You know these things you're seeing are horrible. You know that danger is there. And yet, it's hard to feel much of anything beyond a basic appreciation for the aesthetics. This Girl With the Dragon Tattoo is an ice sculpture of a film. Beautiful to observe, but with little to contemplate. By the time this mystery finally melts, you won't remember much beyond how pretty it all looked.

Post by NewfieBullet (128 posts) See mini bio

nothing about the original made me want to see it and the same with this one.

Post by therealminime (15 posts) See mini bio

3 STARS HOW DARE YOU!

Just kidding. I was worried about this as adapting that colossal novel into a quality screenplay is something few could do well. That being said, I do look forward to seeing it simply for the things that you pointed out as being good; cinematography, acting, music.

Post by Alex (325 posts) See mini bio
Moderator

@therealminime: Yeah, let me be clear: If you're a fan of the source material, or just like looking at really well-shot, well-scored, well-acted movies, Dragon Tattoo is worth a watch. It's not great, but it's a totally okay movie that does a few things quite well.

Post by therealminime (15 posts) See mini bio

@Alex: I can't say I have any attachment to the source material, but I was expecting a similar quality of script as The Social Network. But, I am totally down for a really well-shot, well-scored, well-acted movie.

Post by Atwa (50 posts) See mini bio

I am 100% sure that I will enjoy this one more than the Swedish one. Fincher is my favorite director, and I am Swedish. I realize that may sound weird, but if you actually understand Swedish I do think the original trilogy is worse. The writing really is not good, and i'm not sure if that comes across if you only read the subtitles.

Post by Icon (544 posts) See mini bio

Alex, this is yet another incredibly well written review. You consistently remind me why I like this site as much as I do.

Post by BL1TZKRI3G (14 posts) See mini bio

I was not expecting this to get a less favourable review than Mission Impossible. I know which of the two I will go see now. I'm glad the actors are great. I was skeptical about both Mara and Craig when they were cast but I'm happy to see that they could both pull it off!

Post by SolidOcelot (34 posts) See mini bio

generally from what i heard, this a a "temper your expectations" kind of movie, its not bad per-say but its also a movie with a lot of buzz that is unfortunately unearned.

Post by TentPole (105 posts) See mini bio

So it is the same as the original then.

Post by psychpunk (271 posts) See mini bio

Insightful review. I wasn't planning on seeing this anyway since I'm so sick of this series after reading all the books and watching all the movies last year. But I'll prob check it out on blu ray or something. By your description, I am interested in the performances.

Post by AssInAss (566 posts) See mini bio

Could the script's problems be because Steven Zaillian spent more time on the Moneyball script with Aaron Sorkin? It's like Sorkin brought the super technical baseball dealings and politics, and Zaillian brought the humanity. Too much rushing, to have scripts for 2 movies made.

Post by psychpunk (271 posts) See mini bio

Also gotta say, it's great you guys are getting more and more access to review movies early.

Post by Dany (544 posts) See mini bio

Having seen the films and read the books I am excited to see the movie but if hte movie is as dense as the books and doesn't let room to breathe, that could be a real issue.

Post by Deathpooky (47 posts) See mini bio

That matches up what I remember from the book. I spent the first 100-200 pages wondering why this was getting so much adulation and fighting through it, then blasted through the rest once the story got going, the duo got together and the investigation started to come together. Sad that the screenwriter couldn't do more to solve that, but I suppose you can't stray too far from the source material that sold a billion copies. Maybe a Sorkin-esque hand (i.e., more egotistical and willing to chop it up to serve his own ends) would have done better.

Too bad it's not going to live up to the buzz. Some great trailers were had by all and it seemed to have all the right pieces going in.

Post by spilledmilkfactory (156 posts) See mini bio

"You know these things you're seeing are horrible. You know that danger is there. And yet, it's hard to feel much of anything beyond a basic appreciation for the aesthetics. This Girl With the Dragon Tattoo is an ice sculpture of a film. Beautiful to observe, but with little to contemplate. By the time this mystery finally melts, you won't remember much beyond how pretty it all looked."

That's pretty much my opinion of the books and Swedish movies in a nutshell. I especially can't comprehend how anyone could've enjoyed the novels, as they were just so dry and icy. The second and third movies at least attempted to create characters you'd care about, but the first was just a series of people getting raped for no apparent reason (yes, it all connects later, but there's no real payoff for any of it in the first movie/novel) followed by a boring investigation that ends all too quickly, even as it drags on forever. I was interested in seeing this American adaption to see how they approached such unapproachable material, but it doesn't seems like they've found a much better way to tackle it all

Post by FoxMulder (246 posts) See mini bio

Meh...I'm still really looking forward to it! Never saw the Swedish ones because I wanted to hold out for Finchers version. I will still definately see it sometime this week.

Post by Dylabaloo (821 posts) See mini bio

I have a feeling this will be one that will really benefit from a directors cut.

Edit: Those last lines are beautiful Alex.

Post by Popcorn (191 posts) See mini bio

I know I watched the Swedish version but I just can't remember what happened so this will be like watching it for the first time for me.

Post by Mr_skeleton (953 posts) See mini bio

@Dylabaloo said:

I have a feeling this will be one that will really benefit from a directors cut.

I think Fincher's version was about 20 minutes longer so there is a good chance we will see one.

Anyway I am still very excited to see this film

77 votes, 3.9 avg.
General Information Edit
Name The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo
US Release Dec. 20, 2011
UK Release Dec. 26, 2011
AUS Release Jan. 12, 2012
Runtime 158
Language(s)
Add a new language
Genre(s)
Add a new genre
Theme(s)
Add a new theme
Rating R
Alias(es)
Top Rated Lists
Movies watched 2011 a list of 116 items by Christina
DVD Collection! a list of 234 items by TheLawnWrangler
  • In today's dollars
    Domestic $102,363,771
    Foreign +128,793,970
  • = total worldwide gross $231,157,741
  • - a reported budget of $90,000,000
  • = a 156.8% net profit of $141,157,741
Top Editors
Mandatory Network

Submissions can take several hours to be approved.

Save ChangesCancel