World War Z Movie Needs Money, Gets PG-13 Rating Target

Topic started by Alex on March 22, 2011. Last post by Nightfang 2 years, 1 month ago.
Post by Alex (325 posts) See mini bio
Moderator

 One day, we will see zombies depicted in film.
 One day, we will see zombies depicted in film.
While the world is, understandably, weary of zombified apocalypses appearing across various entertainment mediums after the deluge of zombie everything pop culture has been inundated with over the last several years, one of the few remaining projects of interest that has yet to unleash walking, fetid corpses on the highly suspecting public is Paramount's adaptation of World War Z, the Max Brooks-written "oral history" of a future zombie war. Brad Pitt's production company has been developing the project for some time, and Pitt himself was set to star, with Quantum of Solace director Marc Forster helming the project. Now, that may all have been for naught.
 
According to Vulture, Paramount is seeking additional funding for the movie, and if it can't find it, it may just put a shotgun barrel to the cranium of the whole project. However, fear not zombie enthusiasts, as there still may be a chance. 
 
You may have heard from various sources about how the son and daughter of Oracle CEO Larry Ellison, David and Megan, are taking an active interest in funding films of their particular fancy. Megan has taken the more indie route, coming to the possible rescue of such films as the latest from The Proposition and The Road director John Hillcoat, and P.T. Anderson's Scientology movie, The Master. David has taken a bigger-budget road, funding the Coens' True Grit, the next Mission: Impossible movie, and now, he may sink some funding into World War Z. If he doesn't? Well, they could always take a cue from the Robocop Statue movement and start up a Kickstarter campaign!
 
One other tidbit to come from all this is the fact that Forster has agreed to a PG-13 rating for the film, as to avoid any of the issues Guillermo Del Toro just recently ran into trying to get his At the Mountains of Madness adaptation off the ground. PG-13 zombies? How do you even do that? The Walking Dead couldn't even get away with that, and that's on television! That thing that kids watch!
Post by xobballox (33 posts) See mini bio
PG-13 zombies sucks :(  Kinda disappointed.
Post by CashBailey (1,574 posts) See mini bio
Hooray for rich people!! (for once)
Post by habbyman (52 posts) See mini bio

PG-13? Count me out, man :/

Post by VioletEyedDragon (1,813 posts) See mini bio
Online Now
i think this is awesome.  
 
and i am legend made a lot of money for a pg-13 zombie film
Post by Jesus (315 posts) See mini bio
R rating or GTFO.
Post by Flap_jackson (883 posts) See mini bio
Doesn't Brad Pitt have 100 million lying around? I'm sure he'll make it all back.
Post by Milkman (645 posts) See mini bio
How the hell do you make a PG-13 zombie movie? Fuck Hollywood.
Post by dvorak (444 posts) See mini bio
They might as well just release it on Blu-Ray or DVD at this point. Films stuck in development hell this long normally come out really bad.
Post by jimjimman (38 posts) See mini bio

At this point it would be best for everyone involved if the project was just scrapped.  No one is going to go see a PG-13 zombie movie, and no studio is going to put up the money to make this movie if it has in R rating.
Post by vinsanityv22 (375 posts) See mini bio
Zombies suck, so I don't care much. I will however say that, if Pitt digs it so much, why can't he pump some of his money into it and work for scale? He's BRAD EFFIN' PITT. He can make it up in a heartbeat, signing on for Ocean's 14 or something next year. And if he can't, who cares - he's MARRIED TO ANGELINA JOLIE. 
And secondly, stop asking stupid questions about how you can do a PG13 movie like this. I HATE how Internet geeks make a big sh** about PG-13 movies. A PG-13 in 2011 is easily an R from 2003. The MPAA is quickly getting de-sensitized to stuff that used to be "shocking". All this means is less f-bombs and titties. It'll still be horrendously violent. Good for Marc Forster.
Post by Godlyawesomeguy (604 posts) See mini bio
A watered down PG-13 zombie flick? No, thanks.
Post by BaneFireLord (137 posts) See mini bio
You are fucking kidding me, right? Right? The whole gorram point of WWZ was how gritty and violent an actual zombie war would be!
Post by Godlyawesomeguy (604 posts) See mini bio
@vinsanityv22 said:
"All this means is less f-bombs and titties. "
See, that is exactly the problem.
Post by CenturionCajun (113 posts) See mini bio
Well, if they avoid any outright decapitations and gratuitous zombie brain eating in the violence they might be able to make a PG-13 rated movie that still conveys the violence of the book. In the end the book was just about what would probably go down and not about the actual violence and gore. Just like The Walking Dead after a point the zombies are kind of a part of the landscape.
 
I will say that it's disappointing how Hollywood seems to be abandoning actual horror movies in favor of the watered down Twilight versions. However, that's where the money is coming from so you can't really blame them. I guess I blame society.
Post by Bigheart711 (1,496 posts) See mini bio
@Milkman said:
" How the hell do you make a PG-13 zombie movie? Fuck Hollywood. "
Same. Here.
Post by Sharpshooter (184 posts) See mini bio
How the hell do you do zombies in PG? Zombies by their very nature are blood violent creature. Any time I've seen toned down zombies on TV or movies (episodes of Buffy the Vampire Slayer come to mind) they have sucked donkey balls. Zombies loose their disturbing edge if they arn't violently ripping people apart. 
Post by DanK (11 posts) See mini bio
I don't get it.  Why even bother getting the rights to a book like World War Z if that's what you're going to do to it?  Fucking slack-jawed pussies up in Hollywood.
 
Of course I understand why, though - a built up brand name to easily exploit nerd fanbase yup yup... fuck all you execs.
Post by jakob187 (969 posts) See mini bio
PG-13?!  No fucking thank you.
Post by Maury85 (26 posts) See mini bio
And yet, ANOTHER example of the rating system infantilizing movies, and by extension, audiences.
General Information Edit
Name World War Z
US Release June 21, 2013
UK Release June 21, 2013
AUS Release June 20, 2013
Runtime 0
Language(s)
Add a new language
Genre(s)
Add a new genre
War
Theme(s)
Add a new theme
Rating PG-13
Alias(es)
Top Rated Lists
Upcoming Films I'm Looking Forward To a list of 18 items by asian_pride
2013 Wish List a list of 42 items by ddensel
Movies I'm Looking Forward to seeing a list of 25 items by RogueStryker
Similar Movies Edit
We don't have any info about World War Z's related movies. Help us fill it in!
Related Pages Edit
We don't have any info about World War Z's related cliches. Help us fill it in!
  • a reported budget of $170,000,000
Top Editors
Mandatory Network

Submissions can take several hours to be approved.

Save ChangesCancel